Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/28/2020

S.Pragatheeswaran (age 49) S/o. M.Shanmugasundaram, 162/12, Gandhi Road, Mannargudi, Thiruvarur District. Ph:99940 34183 - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.Muruganantham, Counter No.1, Head Post Office, Mannargudi, Thiruvarur District. And Another - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

28 Feb 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.28/2020

 

(Against the Order dt.27.11.2019 made in C.C. No.39/2018 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Tiruvarur)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

S. Pragatheeswaran,

S/o. Mr. M. Shanmughasundaram,

No.162/ A, Gandhi Road,

Mannargudi,

Thiruvarur District.                                                           .. Appellant / Complainant.  

 

-Versus-

1. Muruganantham,

Counter No.1,

Head Post Office,

Mannargudi,

Thiruvarur District.     

 

2. The Post Master,

Head Post Office,   

Mannargudi,

Thiruvarur District.                                                  .. Respondents / Opposite parties.

 

Appellant / Complainant                                     : Party in person

Counsel for Respondents / Opposite parties     : M/s. R. Kumar

      

                This appeal coming up before us on 28.02.2023 for appearance of appellant/ party in person and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

Respondent Nos.1 & 2 present and ready for arguments.  No representation for the appellant/ party in person.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant/ party in person and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT