Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/212/2011

Smt.J.Bharathi,W/o.j.B.Reddy - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.M/s.India Bulls Housing Finance Limited, India Bulls House, 448-451, Udyog Vihar,Phase-V, - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.K.Ramachandra Reddy, 201, Gokul Residency, 6-3-1177, B.S.Maktha,

26 Sep 2012

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/212/2011
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/01/2011 in Case No. CC/615/2009 of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. Smt.J.Bharathi,W/o.j.B.Reddy
502,Vamsee Estate, Ameerpet, Hyderabad
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1.M/s.India Bulls Housing Finance Limited, India Bulls House, 448-451, Udyog Vihar,Phase-V,
Gurgaon, Haryana, Rep.by.its.Managing director
2. 2.M/s.India Bulls Housing Finance Limited, Venkat plaza, 4th Floor,
Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Rep.by.its.Manager,
3. 3.M/s.Max New York Life Insurance Company Limited, 5th Floor, Naspur House,
Main Road, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad
Rep.by.its.Manager
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr.K.Ramachandra Reddy, 201, Gokul Residency, 6-3-1177, B.S.Maktha,, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 M/s.L.Venkateswar Rao - R1 and R2, Advocate for the Respondent 1
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:

                        

F.A.No.212/2011 against C.C.No.615/2009, District Forum-II, Hyderabad.

Between:

Smt J.Bharathi , W/o.J.B.Reddy,

Aged about 49 years,

502, Vamsee Estate,

Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

           

1.M/s. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd.,

  

   

  

 

2. M/s. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd.,

   th

   

 

3. M/s. Max New York Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,

   

   

    

                                                                

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant           

 

Counsel for the respondents       

 

 

 

QUORUM: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT,

                                                      

 

       

                               

 

Oral order (Per 

 

                                The unsuccessful complainant      

                Further, the opposite party no.2 had forcibly and    towards the said insurance premium in the name of J.Vamsee Krishna who stood as guarantor             Opposite parties 1 and 2           

 

Resisting the complaint, the opposite parties     

 

At the time of loan proposal, opposite party no.2 has never                  towards pre closure charges. The complainant   

 

        

 

       

 

Aggrieved by the said order, 

 

         

        

1.Whether the impugned order of the District Forum is liable t be set aside ? If so on what grounds?

2.To what relief?

 

 It is an admitted                         

 

            

 

         working capital, which 

 

          

 

        

                                                                        

                                                                       Pm*                                                                  

 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.