Karnataka

Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

CC/803/2016

M/s.Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

21 Mar 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 20
PRESENT SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B., PRESIDENT
SRI.H.JANARDHAN, B.A.L., LL.B., MEMBER
 
Complaint Case No. CC/803/2016
 
1. M/s.Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd.,
KMF Complex, Dr.M.H.Marigowda Road Bangalore-560029, Rep by its Add1. Director Admin Sri.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1.M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd
Divisional Office, S.S.Complex, Subhash Square. Hassan-573201
2. 2.The Regional Manager
M/S. Oriental Insurance Company Sumangala Complex II Floor, Opp HDMC, Lamington Road, Hubli-580020
3. 3.M/s. Medi Assist India Pvt Ltd.,
Tower D, 4th Floor, 1 BC Knowledge Park, 4/1, Bannerghatta Road, Opp.Fire Station, Dairy Circle, Bangalore-560029
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B., PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SMT. BHARATI.B.VIBHUTE. B.E., L.L.B., MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.JANARDHAN.H MEMBER B.A., L.L.B MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 21 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

CC.No.803/2016

Dated:21.03.2017

Case called out, complainant absent.  On perusal of the order sheet it reveals that, the stage is set down for evidence of complainant.  Since many dates of hearing complainant remained absent. Inspite of the opportunity is given to the complainant to file its affidavit evidence, however, for the reasons best known to the complainant but the complainant did not come forward to file its affidavit evidence.  The continuous absence of the complainant and non-filing of the affidavit evidence shows that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. 

     Further the complainant has to prove its case by filing affidavit evidence but the complainant did not turn to file his affidavit evidence.  The case of the parties cannot be appreciated merely on the basis of pleadings.  The pleadings are not the substitute for evidence.  In the attendant circumstances of the case, the complaint is dismissed for want of prosecution.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SMT. BHARATI.B.VIBHUTE. B.E., L.L.B.,]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.JANARDHAN.H MEMBER B.A., L.L.B]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.