BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

E.A.No.60/2013

in  

C.C.No.24/2011 

Between:

V.Srinivasa Rao,

S/o. Mr. Lakshmi Manohara Rao,

Aged about 42 years,

Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No.402,

Vema Kamala Towers, Begumpet,

Hyderbad -                                             ….. Applicant/Complainant

AND

1.   Maytas Properties Limited,

(Formerly Known as M/s. Mytas Hill Country (P) Ltd.),

Rep. by its Managing Director

M.Arun Kumar Saha S/o. Brindavan Chandra Saha,

R/o. Maytas Hill Country, Bachupally Village & Post,

Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,

Hyderabad - 500072.

2.   Mr. Arun Kumar Saha,

S/o. Brindavan Chandra Saha,

Aged 60 years, managing Director

R/o. Maytas Hill Country, Bachupally Village & Post,

Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,

Hyderabad - 500072.                    …Respondents / Opposite parties

State Bank of Patiala                                            …Proposed Party

Counsel for the Applicant /Complainant:   M/s. V.Appa Rao

Counsel for the  Respondents / Opposite parties

                                                                 :   M/s. K.Visweswar Reddy     

Counsel for the Proposed Party :              M/s. Sandhya Sree      

Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla   …     President

&

Hon’ble Sri Patil Vithal Rao  …              Member

THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST,

       TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN. 

Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri. B.N.Rao Nalla, President).

     ***

             Counsel on both sides present.  Respondent /Opposite Party No.1 filed compromise memo stating that, “in compliance of this Hon’ble State Commission order dated 26.08.2016, to refund of Equated Monthly Installment (E.M.I.) amounts including 12% interest on it.

1.     The Respondent No.1/Opposite Party herein has refunded ‘E.M.I amount’ as well as ‘interest on E.M.I amount’ as per below cheque:

Rs.33,99,836/- vide Cheque No.184549 dated 29.11.2016 drawn on State Bank of India, Nizampet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

2.    The  Respondent No.1/Opposite Party handed over the Cheque to Complainant counsel before this Hon’ble State Commission and as per information received from respective Bank the Petitioner / Complainant has received and encashed the amount, but did not report before this Hon’ble Commission for such a long period.  (Copy of acknowledged cheque was enclosed herewith as an annexure).

                Inview of the said fact the compliance of the orders by this Respondent No.1/Opposite Party No.1, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Commission may be pleased to pass necessary orders dismissing / closing the above Execution Application No.60/2013 in C.C.No.24/2011 filed by the Petitioner / Complainant”.

 Permission is accorded.  Memo recorded.  In the circumstances, E.A. is closed as withdrawn.

PRESIDENT   MEMBER        

Dt. 31.08.2017