BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD

E.A.57/2013

in

CC 83/2010

Between :

M. Pavan Kumar

S/o Mr. Naga Raja Prasad, aged about 34 years

R/o 504, Pragathi Residency, Street No.9

East Maredupally, Secunderabad – 500 026     …Petitioner/complainant

And

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd, ( Formerly known as M/s Maytas

Hill Country (P) Ltd rep by its Managing Director

Mr. Arun Kumar Saha, S/o Brindavan Chandra Saha

R/o Mayatas Hill Country, Bachupally village and Post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

Hyderabad – 500 072

2. Mr. Arun Kumar Saha

S/o Brindavan Chandsra Saha aged about 60 years

Managing Director, M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd

R/o Maytas Hill Country, Bachupally Village & Post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy district

Hyderabad – 500 072                                  ..Respondents/opposite parties

3. The State Bank of India

Rep by its City Case Officer

Stressed Assets Recovery Branch (SARB)

2^nd floor, APSRTC complex,

Commuter Centre ( Bus Terminal Complex)

Koti, Hyderabad -500 095.

.

Counsel for the Petitioner                          :           M/s. V. Appa Rao

Counsel for the Respondents                   :           M/s. K. Visweswar Reddy for R1 & R2

                                                                                    M/s. V. Srikrishnudu for R3..

            Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH  DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

                                                       Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, Hon’ble President )

                                                            *******

1. This  Execution  Application is  filed by the petitioners/complainants  U/s. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance  of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC No. 83 of 2010 on the file of this Commission and orders dated 08.07.2013 passed in FA No 377 of 2012 on the file of the Hon’ble National Commission and punish them as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.

2. Heard the counsel on both sides.

3. Counsel for the respondent no.3 Bank filed affidavit along with Joint Memo stating that the entire claim amount of Rs.87,115/- ( Rupees Eighty Seven Thousand One Hundred and Fifteen only)  was paid by the Bank to the complainant towards full and final settlement. Hence the E.A. stands disposed of, i.e., dismissed as withdrawn.

                                                                                                            PRESIDENT.