BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION
EA No. 51of 2013
in
CC 7 of 2010
Between:
I.Surendra,
S/o Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy, aged about 43 years,
R/o Flat no. 502, Emerald Block
Sri Sairam Manor, Pragathi Nagar
Yousufguda, Hyderabad Petitioner/complainant
And
- M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd
(now known as Hill County Properties Ltd
Rep by its Managing Director
Mr. Arun Kumar Saha, S/o Brindavan Chandra Saha
R/o Maytas Hill Country, Bachupally village and post
Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Hyderabad – 500 072 .
- Mr. Arun Kumar Saha
S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha, age about 60 years,
Managing Director, Maytas Properties Limited
(now known as Hill County Properties Limited )
Regd. Office at Hill County, Bachupally,
Autubhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Hyderabad – 500 072. .. Respondents/opposite parties
- Axis Bank Limited
( Hyderabad Branch)
Rep by its Branch Manager
PM MOdi complex
2nd floor, 5-4-187/6,
M.G. Road, Secunderabad proposed respondent.
Counsel for the petitioner : M/s. V. Appa Rao
Counsel for the Respondent : M/s. K. Vishweshwara Reddy for
R1 to R3
M/s. M. Srinivasa Reddy for the proposed respondent
Coram : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT
And
SRI PATIL VITHAL RAO, MEMBER
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN
Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )
*******
- This is an application filed by the complainant U/s.27 of the Consumer Protection Act seeking to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC 7 of 2010 on the file of this Commission and orders dated 08.07.2013 passed in FA No. 369 of 2012 on the file of the Hon’ble National Commission and punish them as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.
- Counsel on both sides present. Heard. Counsel on both sides informed that the petitioner has received the total amount and that they have no claim against the respondents/opposite parties and requested to dispose of the case towards full and final settlement as settled out of court..
- In view of the above facts and circumstances, the E.A. is closed as settled out of court towards full and final settlement. Since EA is closed, EAIA 2922 of 2013 to EAIA 2926 of 2013 and EAIA 98 of 2014 are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
PRESIDENT MEMBER
DATED : 25.10.2016.