BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :HYDERABAD

F.A.No.880/2009   Visakhapatnam

Between:

1.M/s. Bhavani Agencies,

represented by its partners,

C/o.P.Manjunath, Flat No.10,

Hill View Apartments,

Seethammadhara North Extension,

Visakhapatnam.

2. Sri P.Manjunath , S/o.P.Radhakrishna Chetty,

 Hindu, aged 52 yrs, Occ:Business, Flat No.10 ,

 Visakhapatnam.

3. Sri M.V.S.N.Rama 

Hindu, aged 51 yrs., Occ:Business, D.No.15-18-17,

Beach Road,Visakhapatnam                                                                         Sri Garuda Nageswara Rao, S/o.late Seetharamayya,

Hindu, aged 73 yrs., residing at D.No.26-15-67,33

Godowns, Main Road, Visakhapatnam-530 001.                                                                                      

Counsel for the Appellant   

Counsel for the respondent :     

F.A.No.1087/2009  Visakhapatnam

Between:

Sri Garuda Nageswara Rao, S/o.late Seetharamayya,

Hindu, aged 70 yrs., residing at D.No.26-15-67,33

Godowns,Main Road,Visakhapatnam.                                                                                                          

1.M/s. Bhavani Agencies,

represented by its Partners,

C/o.Manjunath, Flat No.10,

Hill View Apartments,

Seethammadhara North Extension,

Visakhapatnam.

2. Sri P.Manjunath , S/o.P.Radhakrishna Chetty,

 Hindu, aged 49 yrs, Occ:Business, Flat No.10 ,

 Visakhapatnam.

3. Sri M.V.S.N.Rama 

Hindu, aged 47 yrs., Occ: Business, D.No.15-18-17,

Beach Road,Visakhapatnam                                                                        

 Counsel for the Appellant      

Counsel for the Respondents  

CORAM:SMT.M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE MEMBER

AND

SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD

TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN.

Oral Order : (Per Smt. M.Shreesha, Hon’ble Member).

F.A.No.880/2009 has been preferred by the opposite parties aggrieved by the order in Visakhapatnam  

        st    Visakhapatnam              numbers of                   for which the complainant                         

The complainant got issued a registered legal notice on 7.10.2005 demanding        that                    

                                undivided share in the site i.e. 323 sq.yards   and in view of the same alone    any money                 hiring of service and it is totally beyond the Consumer Protection Act. 

Opposite parties submit that              and also liable           together with maintenance charges                   

             Civil Court

           Civil Court   

       Visakhapatnam. Under no circumstances       

 The opposite parties filed a xerox copy of the approved plan pertaining to the stilt floor of the multi storied building (Ex.B4) which shows that on 15.4.2002,  Visakhapatnam      

         delivered by the opp.parties to the complainant. The contention of the opp.parties      delivering 

It is an admitted fact that 10% of the construction work in the four flats (Ex.A3)      Apex Court Apex Court

                     construction   

In view of the aforementioned judgement while                    and we direct the opp.parties to pay Rs.3/- per sq.ft. per month as per clause 11 of the agreement.    

construction of all four flats which fell      

        The opp.parties are entitled to this amount on delivery of the four flats