BEFORE THE  A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD.

           Between:

Smt.W/Age: 55 years,R/o.406, Highness Residency,

GHMC No.3-6-527, St.No.7,

Himayathnagar, Hyderabad- 500 029. 

               1.M/s. Srirep. by S/ Occ:Business, having its office 

1^stChiragali,Hyderabad.

2.S/

Occ:Business, having its office at Unit no.3,

1^stTower,Abids,Hyderabad.

3.NamanAged: 30 

having its office at Unit no.3, 1^stRaghavaAbids,Hyderabad. 

4.S/Aged 26 years,

at unit no.3, 1^stChiragali,Hyderabad.   

Counsel for the complainant    Counsel for the 

QUORUM:  SMT.M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE INCHARGE PRESIDENT,

AND

    SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMER.

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY  OF APRIL,

 Oral Order: (Per Sri           

           The complainants filed the complaint under Section 17 (1)(a)( 

g). to pay an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- the cost incurred for rectification of the defects and other defaults h).  

i) to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- 

j). to pay an amount of Rs.2,50,000/-   

g) to pay an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- 

h) to award interest @ 18% per annum on the amounts payable to the complainant from the date of entitlement till realization.

The total value of the claims and other compensations of the complaint is Rs.26,89,600/-

The case of the complainant as set out in the complaint in brief isOpposite party                                           

The complainant submits    and when                by way        

After                       

The complainants submits that after taking possession of the flat, she noticed      

The complainant submits, that permission  and in violation of the permit, opposite parties have raised commercial establishments                   

         strict proof of the same.    purchase of the flat without any objection or complaint    

                    deed

                    area of the flat        

 These               

                        given mental agony and torture to the false and frivolous grounds without any basis.

These opposite parties further contended that   hence           

These      malice to extract illegal amounts from the answering    very much aware that the  way back in the year 2007 itself.        

1.  Whether the complaint is barred by limitation as contended by the2.  Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the3.  To what relief?

Claim No.1: For     

The case of the complainant is that the area of the flat including common area is 1187   

             Though the area of the flat no.406                  

Claim No.2:For an amount of Rs.3,56,000/- the excess amount collected from the complainant @ Rs.300/- per 

       The case of the         

  In support of this claim, the complainant filed Exs.A6                           

 The case of the complainant is that the total             

It was categorically agreed between the parties that the area of the flat is 1230       

 Further, as per Clause 7 of the               and a decision reported in 1999 (8) SCC 588       Therefore, the claim of the complainant is an imaginary figure and without any basis  

Claim No.4: For refund of an amount of Rs.3,29,000/- towards the excess amount that was collected on common area which was loaded at 18% without any logical prorate calculation:

 Under this claim, the case of the complainant is that    

 The total construction        

In support of this claim, the complainant filed Ex.A15       

The builder was asked to complete the incomplete          

Further, once the complainant made payment       

Claim No.5 

In support of this claim, the complainant filed Ex.A13            

Claim No.6:   

Under this                 

In support of this claim , the complainant filed Ex.A14 ,      

Claim No.7 

In support of   Constructions in           but not the defects in the flat of the complainant.                

Claim no.8: For an amount of Rs.2,52,000/- (Rs.13,000/- towards house   

  Under this claim , case of the complainant is that the time for completion of the construction of the subject             maintenance , during the delay period. The complainant is therefore entitled to 

In support of this claim, the complainant filed Ex.A5 Agreement of Sale cum Construction, Ex.A8 legal notice            

Further, as seen from Ex.A6 and A8          

Claim no.9: For an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- towards        

Under this claim, the case of the complainant is that  hazardous activities    On number of occasions , the complainant demanded the opposite parties to remove         

It is the case of the                       

In support of the above case, the     

ble    

In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above , we are of the view that the complainant has no right to demand damages for      

Claim Nos.10 and 11:     

In view     

Under Claim no. 12 the complainant claimed that she is entitled to claim interest on the claims at 18%  

For the afore said facts and circumstances, the complainant failed to establish 

                                                               Pm*                                                         

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined 

For the Complainant :nilChief Affidavit evidence  

Affidavits in lieu of chief examination of DW.1 are filed  behalf of the respondents 

Exhibits marked on behalf of the complainant:

Ex.A1 : 

Ex.A2 

Ex.A3  

Ex.A4 :   

Ex.A5 : Agreement of sale cum construction

Ex.A6 :Notice issued by 

Ex.A7 :  

Ex.A8   

Ex.A9:Reply notice

Ex.A10   

Ex.A11 : 

Ex.A12   

Ex.A13: DD. For Rs.24,500/- 

Exs.A14:  

Ex.A15 :Notice issued by

Ex.A16 :Proceedings dt.15.9.09 issued by GHMC pertaining to Flat

Ex.A17 : 

Ex.A18 : Notice u/s. 452

Ex.A19:Representation            

Ex.A20 to 34 :                                           

Ex.A35:Order passed in WP.No.27397/11 of

Ex.A36 : Photographs of the apartment , two in number.

Ex.A37 :  

Exhibits marked on behalfEx.B1  

Ex.B2 

Ex.B3  

MEMBER

                                                               PM*