Date of Filling:      23.03.2016

                                                                                                                       Date of Disposal:  05.10.2018

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

THIRUVALLUR-1

PRESENT:   THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.                                 ….PRESIDENT

THIRU:R.BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc.L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP.,      …MEMBER

CONSUMER COMPLAINT No.14/2016

FRIDAY, THE 05 DAY OF OCTOBER 2018

Manonmani Trust Hussain House

No.7, Kondi Chetty Street,

Chennai -600 001.

Rep by its Managing Trustee

Ms.Sudha Ramalingam.                                              ….Complainant

                                                         //Vs//

1.M/s.PMK Brick Works,

    Rep. by its Partner, K.Suresh,

    No.78, Thirukandalam village&Post

    Uthokottai Taluk

    Thiruvallur District.

2. K.Suresh,

    No.78, Thirukandalam village&Post

    Uthokottai Taluk

    Thiruvallur District.

 3. Mukarjee Rao,

    No.78, Thirukandalam village&Post

    Uthokottai Taluk

    Thiruvallur District.                                                 ……..  Opposite parties

Counsel for the complainant:                        M/s.N.C. Ravichandran, Advocate

Counsel for the opposite parties:                  Ex-parte.

ORDER

PRONOUNCED BY THIRU S.PANDIAN, PRESIDENT

This complaint has been preferred by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 against the opposite parties seeking direction to pay a sum of Rs.11,68,238.00/- towards compensation due to the deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party and with cost.

Proof Affidavit of the complainant is not filed even posted today as NFA.  No other representation.  However passed it over to 11.55A.M.

At 11.55.A.M

Complainant is called absent.  No other representation even posted today as No Further adjournment and further, more than the sufficient time and opportunities given, not even chosen to appear before this Forum all along the Hearing dates.  However passed it over to 4.00.P.M.

At.4.00 P.M.

Complainant is called absent.  No other representation.  Today, it is posed for filing of the Proof Affidavit of the complainant to substantiate the allegations made against the opposite parties on production of the relevant documents before this Forum and the same to be marked.  It is further enlightened that though the opposite parties 1to 3 are remined ex-parte, it is the bounden duty of the complainant to putforth the evidence to prove the allegations, then only this Forum can arrive just decision of the case purely on merits.

 In such circumstances, in spite of several and sufficient opportunities given to the complainant the proof Affidavit of the complainant as her evidence is not filed.  More so the complainant not even chosen to appear before this Forum to proceed with the further progress of the complaint.  It clearly shows that the disinterest of the complainant to proceed further with.  Therefore, there is no justification to prolong further and also there is no valid and genuine reason to adjourn this case further by wasting the golden time of this Forum, Since it is pending from the year 2016.

In this Result, this complaint is Dismissed for default.  No Cost.

This order has been pronounced by us in the open Forum on this 05^th October 2018.

                     -Sd-                                                                                  -Sd-

                MEMBER                                                                      PRESIDENT