Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/309/2019

Mrs.S.K.Fathima Begum, W/o Mr.Jaffer Sait, No.8/4, Iswariya Nagar 9th Street, Karrankulathur, MM Nagar, Chennai-603 209 - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.M/s Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., rep by its manager, 1st Floor, GE Plaza, Airport - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.V.Pavel

31 Mar 2023

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                  BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                    Thiru.R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 309/2019

(Against the order in C.C. No.87/2017, dated 22.8.2019, on the file of

District Consumer Commission, Chennai(North)

 

                                                          DATED THIS THE 31^ST   DAY OF JANUARY 2023

 

Mrs S.Fathima Begum,

W/o Mr.Jaffer Sait,

No.8/4, Iswariya Nagar 9^th street,

Kattankulathur, M.M. Nagar,

Chennai – 603 209                                                ..Appellant/complainant  

 

                                              Vs

 

1. M/s Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company,

Rep.by its Manager, 1^st Floor, GE Plaza, Airport Road,

Yerawada, Pune – 411 006, Maharashtra

Rep.by its Manager, Having a branch office at

Old Nos. 276 & 277 (New Nos.497 &496),

Isana Kattima Building,

Chennai – 600 106                                                   ..Respondent/opposite party

 

Counsel for the Appellant/complainant                   : M/s V.Povel

Counsel for the Respondent/opposite party            : M/s N.Somasundaar

 

          This appeal is coming up before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

                                                                                    Docket order

 

          No representation for appellant. Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost. 

       Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                       R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                      PRESIDENT