Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/297/2019

M/s.Premier Machine Tools, Rep by its Proprietor Mr.P.G.Selvaraj, 256, 1st Cross Street, Ashok Piller Road, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai 600 058. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.Mr.N.Sree Krishnan, Proprietor of M/s.Pushpam Engineering, 62m, Kalaimagal Nagar, 2nd Street, Ashr - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Laxmi Raj Rathnam

01 Oct 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.297/2019

                         DATED THE 01^ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

 

M/s. Premier Machine Tools,

Rep. by its Proprietor

Mr. P.G. Selvaraj,

No.256, 1^st Cross Street,

Ashok Pillar Road,

Ambattur Industrial Estate,

Chennai – 600 058.                                                         .. Appellant / 1^st Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

1. Mr. N. Sree Krishnan,

Proprietor

M/s. Pushpam Engineering,

No.62, 2^nd Street,

Kalaimagal Nagar,

Ashramam Road,

Thirumudivakkam,

Chennai – 600 044.                                                     .. 1^st Respondent / Complainant.

 

2. State Bank of India,

Rep. by its General Manager,

SME Centre,

No.5, Jawaharlal Nehru Road,

Ekkattuthangal,

Chennai – 600 050.                                              .. 1^st Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party.

 

Counsel for the Appellant / 1^st Opposite party           : M/s. A. Laxmi Raj Rathnam

1^st Respondent  / Complainant                                  : Party in person

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent  /2^nd Opposite party : M/s. M.S. Associates

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 01.10.2021 for appearance and filing written arguments of both and for arguments (list) or for dismissal, this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket order

 

            No representation for both parties.  Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both and for filing written argument of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal.  When this matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for both.   Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M., both were again not present.   Written arguments of both also not filed.  Since the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                      Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT