BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD

E.A.87/2013

in

CC 14/2010

Between :

1. Mr. Sandeep Khurana

S/o R. C. Khurana,

Aged about 46 years, Occ : Service Professional

2. Smt. Sarika Khurana, W/o Sandeep Khurana

Both R/o 107, Primrose, Serene country

Gachibowli, Hyderabad – 500 032.                …Petitioners/complainants

And

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd, ( Now known as

Hill County (P) Ltd rep by its Managing Director

Regd. Office at Bachupally village and Post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

Hyderabad – 500 072

Rep by its Managing Director

2. Mr. M.D. Khattar

Managing Director

M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd

( now known as Hill Country Properties Limited\

Regd. Office at Hill country,

Bachupally Village & Post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy district

Hyderabad – 500 072                                  ..Respondents/opposite parties

3. Mr. Arun K. Saha,

Director, Mayatas Properties Limited

( Now known as Hill Country Properties Limited )

Regd office at Hill Country, Bachupally,

Hyderabad – 500 072.

1. The State Bank of India

Rep by its City Case Officer

Stressed Assets Recovery Branch (SARB)

2^nd floor, APSRTC complex,

Commuter Centre ( Bus Terminal Complex)

Koti, Hyderabad -500 095.

Counsel for the Petitioner                          :           M/s. Prabhakar Sripada  

Counsel for the Respondents                   :           M/s. K. Visweswar Reddy for R1 to 3

                                                                                    M/s. V. Srikrishnudu for R4.

Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH  DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

                                               Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, Hon’ble President )

                                                                                                *******

1. This  Execution  Application is  filed by the petitioners/complainants  U/s. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act to initiate necessary proceedings against all respondents/opposite parties and punish them as per Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act for not complying with the order of the State Commission dated 24.07.2013 in CC No. 14 of 2010.

2. Heard the counsel on both sides.

3. Counsel for the respondent no.4 Bank filed affidavit along with Joint Memo stating that the entire claim amount of Rs.35,72,744/- ( Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs Seventy Two Thousand Seven Hundread and Forty four only )  was paid by the Bank to the complainants towards full and final settlement. Hence the E.A. stands disposed of, i.e., dismissed as withdrawn.

                                                                                                            PRESIDENT.