BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION
EA No. 65 of 2013
In
CC 12 of 2010
Between:
- Mr. Arumilli Anand,
S/o Arumilli Krishnudu
Aged about 39 years, Occ : QA Manager
R/o Flat No. 13, Surya Complex,
Durganagar colony, Punjagutta,
Hyderabad
- Smt. S. Pragathi,
W/o Arumilli Anand,
Aged about 34 years, Occ : Systems Analyst,
R/o Flat No. 13, Surya complex,
Durganagar colony, Punjagutta,
Hyderabad .. Petitioners/complainants
And
- M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd
(now known as Hill County Properties Ltd
Regd. Office at Bachupally
Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Hyderabad – 500 072 rep. by its Managing Director
- Mr. M. D. Khattar,
Managing Director
Maytas Properties Limited
(Now known as Hill Country Properties Limited)
Regd. Office at Hill Country, Bachupallhy
Hyderabad – 500 072.
- Mr. Arun Kumar Saha
S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha,
Director, Maytas Properties Limited
(now known as Hill Country Properties Limited )
Regd. Office at Hill Country, Bachupally,
Hyderabad – 500 072. .. Respondents/opposite parties
- ICICI Bank Ltd
Begumpet Branch, rep b its Branch Manager
2nd floor, East Wing ICICI Towers
Road no.1, Begumpet,
Hyderabad – 500016 .. proposed respondent.
Counsel for the petitioner : M/s. Prabhakar Sripada
Counsel for the Respondent : M/s. K. Vishweshwara Reddy for
R1 to R3.
M/s. S. Nagesh Reddy
Coram : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT
And
Sri Patil Vithal Rao, Member
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN
Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )
*******
- This is an application filed by the complainant U/s.27 of the Consumer Protection Act seeking to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC 12 OF 2010 on the file of this Commission and punish them as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.
- Counsel on both sides present. Heard.
- Counsel on both sides informed that the petitioner has received the entire amount and that that they have no claim against the respondents/opposite parties and requested to dispose of the case towards full and final settlement as settled out of court..
- In view of the above facts and circumstances Memo recorded and the E.A. is closed as settled out of court towards full and final settlement. Since EA is closed, EAIA 165 of 2014 and EAIA 482 of 2014 are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
PRESIDENT MEMBER
DATED : 30.11.2016