Telangana

StateCommission

EA/68/2013

1. Kavitha Thonangi - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.Maytas Properties Limited, Regd. Office at Maytas Properties Limited, Hill Country, Bachupally, Mi - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Prabhakar Sripada

25 Oct 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Execution Application No. EA/68/2013
In
 
1. 1. Kavitha Thonangi
2-29-103, Plot 41 P and T Colony, Karkhana Secunderabad-500 009.Andhra Pradesh.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1.Maytas Properties Limited, Regd. Office at Maytas Properties Limited, Hill Country, Bachupally, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500 072.
Rep. by its M.D.
2. 2. Mr. M.D. Khattar, Managing Director, Maytas Propetties Limited, (Now Known as Hill country Properties Limited),
Regd. Office at Hill country Bachupally, Hyderabad-500 072.
3. 3. Mr. Arun K. Saha, Director Maytas Properties Limited, (Now known as Hill Country Properties Limited),
Regd. Office at Hill country Bachupally, Hyderabad-500 072.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 25 Oct 2016
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION

EA No. 68 of 2013

in

 CC 37 of 2011

Between:

Kavitha Thonangi

R/o#2-29-103, Plot # 41

P & T colony, Karkhana

Secunderabad – 500 009

Andhra Pradesh                                                      Petitioner/complainant

 

And

 

  1. M/s. Maytas  Properties Ltd

(now known as  Hill County Properties   Ltd

Regd. Office  at Bachupally

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

 Hyderabad – 500 072 rep. by its Managing Director

 

  1. Mr. M. D. Khattar,
    Managing Director

Maytas Properties Limited

(Now known as Hill County Properties Limited)

Regd. Office at Hill County, Bachupallhy

Hyderabad – 500 072.

 

  1. Mr. Arun Kumar Saha

S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha, age about 60 years,

Director, Maytas Properties Limited

(now known as Hill County Properties Limited )

Regd. Office at Hill County, Bachupally,

Hyderabad – 500 072.                                 ..          Respondents/opposite parties
 

  1. First Blue Home Finance Ltd

( Now known as Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd)

Mumbai,

8-3-949, F No. 302, & 303, 3rd floor, Solitaire Plaza,

Behind image hospital, Ameerpet, Hyderabad – 500 073

Andhra Pradesh.                                         proposed respondent.

 

 

Counsel for the petitioner                                      :           M/s. V. Appa Rao

 

Counsel for the Respondent                                 :           M/s. K. Vishweshwara Reddy for

                                                                                                R1 to R3

                                    M/s.Lotus Law Associates for

                                    Proposed respondent

 

Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                    And

 

                                                SRI PATIL VITHAL RAO, MEMBER

 

                                    TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH  DAY OF OCTOBER

                                                            TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

           

                         Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )

 

                                                            *******

 

  1. This is an application   filed by the complainant U/s.27  of the Consumer Protection Act seeking to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC 37 of 2011 on the file of this Commission and punish them  as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.

 

  1.  Counsel on both sides present. Heard.    Counsel on both sides informed  that the petitioner has received the total amount and  that they have no claim against the respondents/opposite parties and requested to dispose of the case towards full and final settlement as settled out of court..

 

  1. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the E.A. is closed as settled out of court towards full and final settlement. Since EA is closed EAIA 168 of 2014 and EAIA 372 of 2014 are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

 

 

PRESIDENT            MEMBER

            DATED : 25.10.2016.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.