BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION
EA No. 68 of 2013
in
CC 37 of 2011
Between:
Kavitha Thonangi
R/o#2-29-103, Plot # 41
P & T colony, Karkhana
Secunderabad – 500 009
Andhra Pradesh Petitioner/complainant
And
- M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd
(now known as Hill County Properties Ltd
Regd. Office at Bachupally
Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Hyderabad – 500 072 rep. by its Managing Director
- Mr. M. D. Khattar,
Managing Director
Maytas Properties Limited
(Now known as Hill County Properties Limited)
Regd. Office at Hill County, Bachupallhy
Hyderabad – 500 072.
- Mr. Arun Kumar Saha
S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha, age about 60 years,
Director, Maytas Properties Limited
(now known as Hill County Properties Limited )
Regd. Office at Hill County, Bachupally,
Hyderabad – 500 072. .. Respondents/opposite parties
- First Blue Home Finance Ltd
( Now known as Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd)
Mumbai,
8-3-949, F No. 302, & 303, 3rd floor, Solitaire Plaza,
Behind image hospital, Ameerpet, Hyderabad – 500 073
Andhra Pradesh. proposed respondent.
Counsel for the petitioner : M/s. V. Appa Rao
Counsel for the Respondent : M/s. K. Vishweshwara Reddy for
R1 to R3
M/s.Lotus Law Associates for
Proposed respondent
Coram : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT
And
SRI PATIL VITHAL RAO, MEMBER
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN
Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )
*******
- This is an application filed by the complainant U/s.27 of the Consumer Protection Act seeking to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC 37 of 2011 on the file of this Commission and punish them as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.
- Counsel on both sides present. Heard. Counsel on both sides informed that the petitioner has received the total amount and that they have no claim against the respondents/opposite parties and requested to dispose of the case towards full and final settlement as settled out of court..
- In view of the above facts and circumstances, the E.A. is closed as settled out of court towards full and final settlement. Since EA is closed EAIA 168 of 2014 and EAIA 372 of 2014 are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
PRESIDENT MEMBER
DATED : 25.10.2016.