Telangana

StateCommission

FA/102/2014

SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.Govinda Venkata Ramana Wife of. Late Venkata Narsu, - Opp.Party(s)

M.s. Gosala Sreenivasa Rao

09 Mar 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
First Appeal No. FA/102/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/01/2014 in Case No. CC/71/2013 of District Nalgonda)
 
1. SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Branch Office, Near Gandhi Statue, Sagar Road, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District, rep. by its Manager
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1.Govinda Venkata Ramana Wife of. Late Venkata Narsu,
Aged 37 Years, Occ Household R.o. Kalvapalli Village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District
2. 2.Govinda Srinivas, Son of late Venkata Narsu,
Aged 19 Years, Occ Agriculture, R.o. Kalvapalli Village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 09 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

 

FA NO.102 OF 2014 AGAINST CC NO.71 of 2013

ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, NALGONDA

 

Between :

SBI Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,

Branch Office, Near Gandhi Statue,

Sagar Road, Miryalaguda Town,

Nalgonda District, rep. by its Manager.

             …Appellant / Opposite Party

 

AND :

  1. Govinda Venkata Ramana

W/o.Late Venkata Narsu,

Aged 37 years, Occ: Household

 

  1. Govinda Srinivas

S/o.Late Venkata Narsu,

Aged 19 years, Occ: Agriculture

 

Both are R/o.Kalvapalli Village,

Miryalaguda Mandal,

Nalgonda District.

                 …Respondents / Complainants

                                                          

Counsel for the Appellant: M/s.Gosala Sreenivas Rao, Advocate

 

Counsel for the Respondents    :  M/s.Vakkanti Narsimha Rao, Advocate

                                                    

Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla   …     President

&

Sri Patil Vithal Rao  …           Member

 

Thursday, the Nineth day of March,

Two thousand Seventeen

Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri. B.N.Rao Nalla, President).

 

                                                           ***

      Appellant is the Opposite Party.  Respondents are the Complainants in C.C.No.71/2013 on the file of District Forum, Nalgonda.  The District Forum allowed the complaint dated 30.01.2014.

      Aggrieved by the said order, the Opposite Party preferred this appeal, praying to allow as follows:-

  1. To take the appeal on the file.
  2. To set aside the orders of the District Forum in CC.No.71 of 2013 dated 30.01.2014.
  3. To award costs of the appeal and other reliefs.

 

       As per the docket orders dated 07.02.2017 the matter was ordered to be posted under dismissal caption.  Hence the matter appears in today’s cause list under dismissal caption.  Appellant called absent.  Counsel for R1 and R2 present.  Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Appellant though the matter stands posted under dismissal caption.  It seems that the Appellant is no more interested in prosecuting the appeal. 

          In the circumstances this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

 

                                                                       

      PRESIDENT               MEMBER                       

                  Dt.09.03.2017

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.