Andhra Pradesh

Kurnool

CC/60/2004

1. U.Maddamma, W/o Late U.C.Venkateswarlu, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. G.K.Kantha Reddy, S/o G.Seshi Reddy, Agent of LIC, - Opp.Party(s)

Sri.G.Narayana

23 Sep 2004

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/60/2004
 
1. 1. U.Maddamma, W/o Late U.C.Venkateswarlu,
residents of Penchikalapadu Vilalge, Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
2. 2. U.Srilatha, D/o Late U.C.Venkateswarlu,
residents of Penchikalapadu Vilalge, Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
3. 3. U.Srikanth, S/o Late U.C.Venkateswarlu
residents of Penchikalapadu Vilalge, Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1. G.K.Kantha Reddy, S/o G.Seshi Reddy, Agent of LIC,
R/o Sri.V.V.Nilayam, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
2. 2. The Branch Manager, LIC of India,
Yemmiganur Branch, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri.K.V.H. Prasad, B.A., LL.B PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, B.Com., LL.B., MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.C.Preethi, M.A., L.L.B., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

Before the District Forum: Kurnool

Present: Sri K.V.H. Prasad, B.A., LL.B., President

And

Smt C.Preethi, M.A., LL.B., Member

Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, B. Com., LL.B., Member

Thursday the 23rd day of September, 2004

C.D.No.60/2004

 

  1. U.Maddamma,

W/o Late U.C.Venkateswarlu,

 

  1. U.Srilatha,

D/o Late U.C.Venkateswarlu,

 

  1. U.Srikanth,

S/o Late U.C.Venkateswarlu,

1 to 3 all are residents of Penchikalapadu Vilalge,

Gudur Mandal,

Kurnool District.                      … Complainants represented by their counsel

                                                     Sri.G.Narayana, Advocate, Kurnool

 

-Vs-

 

  1. G.K.Kantha Reddy,

S/o G.Seshi Reddy,

Agent of LIC,

R/o Sri.V.V.Nilayam,

Kallur Mandal,

Kurnool District.                … Opposite party No.1represented by their counsel

                                                Sri.U.Satyapal Reddy, Advocate, Kurnool.

 

  1. The Branch Manager,

LIC of India,

Yemmiganur Branch,

Yemmiganur,

Kurnool District.              … Opposite party No.2 represented by their counsel

                                             Sri.L.Hari Hara Natha Reddy, Advocate, Kurnool

 

D O C K E T O R D E R

 

          No representation for both sides.  Sworn affidavit of complainant and interrogatories not filed in spite of posting as last change.  Hence there appears either any diligent prosecution of the matter or any Endeavour to substantiate the claim of the complaint by any cogent material making them on exhibits by any sworn affidavit of complainant.  Therefore the claim of the complainant being not substantiated, there appears no merit and force in the case of the complaint and hence dismissed Under Section 13(2) (c) of C.P. Act.

 

          Pronounced in the open Court, this the 23rd day of September, 2004

 

 

 

                                                          PRESIDENT

MEMBER                                                                                                   MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri.K.V.H. Prasad, B.A., LL.B]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, B.Com., LL.B.,]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.C.Preethi, M.A., L.L.B.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.