BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
FA.NO.184 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDERS IN CC.NO.396/2019,
DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY
Between:
Meeta Jain, W/o.Jitendra Jain,
aged about 51 years,
Past resident, E7/1, RCI Residential Colony,
Research Centre Imarat, RCI Road,
Shamshabad Rangareddy District,
P.O.Vignyana Kancha, Pin 500069
Present resident House No.H28, 1302,
AWHO Sandeep Vihar,
Whitefield – Hoskote Rd, Kannamangala,
Bengaluru, Karnataka 560115).
.……Appellant/Complainant
And
1. Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar
Nigam Limited, Bharat Sanchar Bhawan,
Harish Chandra Mathur Lane,
Janpath New Delhi DI 110001
Email hcpant@BSNL.Co.In, Represented
by its Manager.
2. Bata India Ltd., 27B, Camac Street,
1st Floor, Kolkata West Bengal 700016,
India, Email: arunito.ganguly@bata.com;
batacal@bataindia.com
………..Represented by its Manager.
3. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of
India, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan
(next to Zakir Hussain College) Jawaharlal
Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road)
New Delhi: 110 002
Email ID: ap@trai.gov.in
……..Represented by its Manager.
…..Respondents/Opposite Parties
Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant : Sri Jitendra Jain (PIP)
Counsel for the Respondents/Opp.Parties : M/s. Nitesh – R2
Sri Sudhakar Rao
Kulkarni – R3
QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE
*******
Order :
1. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant/Complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order in CC.No.396/2019 dated 08.02.2021 passed by the District Commission, Ranga Reddy.
2. In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021. Thereafter, this Commission has suo motu issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities. In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present. Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeals are liable to be dismissed has having been abated.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
