BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

FA.NO.805 OF 2020

AGAINST THE ORDERS IN CC.NO.77/2018,

DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY

Between:

Jitendra Jain, S/o.Late Sh Mangal Chand Jain,

Aged about 54 years, Occupation unemployed,

Present residence, E7/1, RCI Colony, RCI Road,

P.O.Vignyana Kancha, P.O. Hyderabad 500069,

(residence wef 01 Dec 2020 shall be Flat No.H28,

1302, AWHO, Sandeep Vihar, Whitefield – Hoskote

Rd, Kannamangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560115)

Email jitukrmobile@gmail.com

                                        .……Appellant/Complainant

And

1. Chief General Manager, BSNL Principal

    General Manager, BSNL Bhavan,

    Hyderabad, Telangana 500063.

2. Officer in charge, Badangpet BSNL Office

    for Customer Care, Beside New Grama

    Panchayat, Sita Meadows, Badangpet,

    Rangareddy District, Telangana 500058.

   …..Respondents/Opposite Parties

Counsel for the Appellant/Complainant     : Sri Jitendra Jain (PIP)

Counsel for the Respondents/Opp.Parties  : Sri Prabhakar Reddy

  QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE

*******

Order :

1.      This is an appeal filed by the Appellant/Complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order in CC.No.77/2018 dated 28.09.2020 passed by the District Commission, Ranga Reddy.

2.       In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021. Thereafter, this Commission has suo motu issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities. In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present. Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeals are liable to be dismissed has having been abated.

3.       Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.