BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
R.P.NO.128 OF 2020
(against the orders in IA.NO.142/2020 IN CC.No.519/2019 on the file of the District Commission- Ranga Reddy
Between:
1. Meeta Jain,
W/o. Jitendra Jain,
Aged about 51 years,
Occ: unemployed.
2. Jitendra Jain,
S/o. Late Sh Mangal Chand Jain,
Aged about 54 years, Occ: unemployed,
present residence,
E7/1, RCI Colony, RCI Road, P.O.,
Vignyana Kancha, P.O., Hyderabad – 500069,
(residence wef. 01 Oct. 2021 shall be
Flat No.H28, 1302,
AWHO, Sandeep Vihar,
Whitefield – Hoskote Road,
Kannamangala, Bengaluru,
Karnataka – 560115. …Appellants/ Complainants
And
1. Chief General Manager,
Bhart Sanchar Bhavan Harish Chandra Mathur Lane
Janpath, New Delhi-110001,
Emails: hcpant@bsnl.Co.In;
Represented by its manager
2. Vodafone idea limited,
Suman Tower, Plot No.18, Sector-11, Gandhinagar,
Gujarat 382011,
Email: Pankaj.Kapdeo@Vodafoneidea.Com.
Represented by it’s manager.
3. Dr. Lal PathLabs Ltd.,
Dr. Lal PathLabs Limited
Regd. Office: Block E, Sector-18, Rohini, New Delhi-11085,
Fax :+91124 4234468
Customer.Care@lalpathlabs.com.
cs@lalpathlabs.com,
Represented by its manager.
4. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan
(next to Zakir Hussain College)
Jawaharlal Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road)
New Delhi: 110002 E-mail ID:ap@trai.gov.in,
Represented by its manager.
....Respondents/Opposite parties
Counsel for the Appellant/ Complainant:Sri Jitendra Jain(PIP)
Counsel for the Respondents/Opposite Parties : Mr. S.Prabhakar
Reddy – R1
: M/s. Srinivas Rao
Pachwa-R2
: M/s. L& L Partners Law Office –R3
:Sri Sudhakar Rao Kulkarni-R4
QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE
*******
Oral Order:
1. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant / Complainant under Section 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order of the District Forum, Ranga Reddy passed in I.A.No.142/2020 in C.C.No.519 of 2019 dated 31.08.2020.
2. In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021. Thereafter, this Commission has suo moto issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities. In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present. Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeal is liable to be dismissed has having been abated.
3. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed.