Telangana

StateCommission

RP/128/2020

1.Meeta Jain - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Jitendra Jain

17 Dec 2021

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Revision Petition No. RP/128/2020
( Date of Filing : 01 Oct 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/08/2020 in Case No. IA/142/2020 of District Rangareddi)
 
1. 1.Meeta Jain
W/o. Jitendra Jain, aged about 51 years, Occ. Unemployed
2. 2.Jitendra Jain
S/o. Late Sh. Mangal Chand Jain, aged about 54 years, Occ. Unemployed, Both are present R/o. E7/1, RCI Colony, RCI Road P.O Vignyana Kancha, PO Hyderabad 500069
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1.Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.,
Bharat Sanchar Bhawan Harish Chandra Mathur Lane, Janpath New Delhi 110001
2. 2.Vodafone IDEA Ltd.,
Suman Tower, Plot No 18, Sector 11, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382011
3. 3.Dr. Lal Pathlabs Ltd.,
Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd.,Regd Office Block E, Sector 18, Rohini New Delhi 110085
4. 4.Chairman Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,
Mahabubnagar DoorSanchar Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg New Delhi 110002
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Dec 2021
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

R.P.NO.128 OF 2020

(against the orders in IA.NO.142/2020 IN CC.No.519/2019 on the file of the District Commission- Ranga Reddy

 

Between:

1. Meeta Jain,

    W/o. Jitendra Jain,

Aged about 51 years,

Occ: unemployed.

    

2. Jitendra Jain,

   S/o. Late Sh Mangal Chand Jain,

Aged about 54 years, Occ: unemployed,

present residence,

E7/1, RCI Colony, RCI Road, P.O.,

Vignyana Kancha, P.O., Hyderabad – 500069,

(residence wef. 01 Oct. 2021 shall be

Flat No.H28, 1302,

    AWHO, Sandeep Vihar,

    Whitefield – Hoskote Road,

    Kannamangala, Bengaluru,

    Karnataka – 560115.                         Appellants/ Complainants

 

And

1.  Chief General Manager,

     Bhart Sanchar Bhavan Harish Chandra Mathur Lane

     Janpath, New Delhi-110001,

     Emails: hcpant@bsnl.Co.In;

     Represented by its manager

 

2.  Vodafone idea limited,

     Suman Tower, Plot No.18, Sector-11, Gandhinagar,

     Gujarat 382011,

     Email: Pankaj.Kapdeo@Vodafoneidea.Com.  

     Represented by it’s manager.

 

   

3. Dr. Lal PathLabs Ltd.,

    Dr. Lal PathLabs Limited

    Regd. Office: Block E, Sector-18, Rohini, New Delhi-11085,

    Fax :+91124 4234468

    Customer.Care@lalpathlabs.com.

    cs@lalpathlabs.com,

    Represented by its manager.

 

4. Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

    Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan

    (next to Zakir Hussain College)

    Jawaharlal Nehru Marg (Old Minto Road)

    New Delhi: 110002 E-mail ID:ap@trai.gov.in,

    Represented by its manager.  

....Respondents/Opposite parties

          

 

Counsel for the Appellant/ Complainant:Sri Jitendra Jain(PIP)

Counsel for the Respondents/Opposite Parties : Mr. S.Prabhakar

                                                                                     Reddy – R1 

                                                                      : M/s. Srinivas Rao

                                                                                         Pachwa-R2   

                                                  : M/s. L& L Partners Law Office –R3  

:Sri Sudhakar Rao Kulkarni-R4

 

                                                 

QUORUM: SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

 

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND TWENTY ONE

*******

Oral Order:

 

1.    This is an appeal filed by the Appellant / Complainant under Section 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 praying this Commission to allow the appeal by setting aside the order of the District Forum, Ranga Reddy passed in I.A.No.142/2020 in C.C.No.519 of 2019 dated 31.08.2020.

2.       In this batch of appeals, the Appellant Sri Jitendra Jain is said to have died on 23.04.2021.  Thereafter, this Commission has suo moto issued notices to the other Appellants/legal representatives of the deceased Jain, who are parties in the connected appeals and the same has been served as per the track record obtained from the postal authorities.  In spite of that, there is no appearance for the LRs/other Appellants in the connected appeals.  The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents are all present.  Since the deceased Appellant died more than seven months back, the appeal is liable to be dismissed has having been abated.

 

3.       Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.