Date of Filling      :  14.11.2016.

                                                                                           Date of Disposal  :  13.06.2017.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THIRUVALLUR - 1.

PRESENT:  THIRU. S.  PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,              …    PRESIDENT

                     TMT.  S.  SUJATHA, B.Sc.,                          …    MEMBER - I

Consumer Complaint No.49/2016

(Dated this Tuesday the 13^th day of June 2017)

R. Elangovan,

No.10/8 A Block,

MMDA Colony,

Arumbakkam,

Chennai - 600 106.                                                                   … Complainant.

/ Versus /

1.  The General Manager,

     AEGON Religare Life Insurance Company Ltd.,

     Maduravoyal Branch,

     Chennai.

2.  The General Manager,

     AEGON Religare Life Insurance Company Ltd.,

     Nomura B - Wing First Floor,

     Unit - 102, Near D - Mart,

     Hiranandani Business Park,

     Hiranandani Gardens,

     Powai,

     Mumbai - 400 076.

3.  M. Vasantharaja Jai Sairam Associates,

     No.308, 1^st Floor, Ayyappa Archade,

     CTH Road,

     Avadi,

     Chennai - 600 054.                                                           … Opposite parties.

Counsel for the complainant                                         :  M/s. M. Kalif Abdulla

Counsel for the opposite parties                                  :  -

ORDER

PRONOUNCED BY THIRU. S.  PANDIAN, PRESIDENT

This complaint is filed by the complainant U/S 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for claiming refund for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation and for causing mental agony and sufferings caused due to gross deficiency in service with cost Rs.25,000/-

Complainant is called absent.  No other representation.

Passed it over

At 11:55 A.M.

Complainant is called absent.   No other representation.  It is seen from adjudication that the complainant is continuously absent for the past hearings i.e. from the first hearing itself and not come forward to take steps against the opposite parties inspite of sufficient opportunities are given.  The Counsel for the complainant is also not appeared.  It clearly shows the disinterest of the complainant in the progress of the complaint against the opposite parties.  Therefore, there is no justification to proceed further.

Hence, this complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

Sd/-****                                                                                        Sd/-****

MEMBER - I                                                                             PRESIDENT