1.Accounts Officer, Telecom Revenue office of the GMT, Kannur 2. V/S K.Basheer, 30.248 Laila Manzil, Gopalpet, Post Temple gate, Tellich erry - Consumer Court Case

Kerala

Kannur

CC/64/2004

K.Basheer, 30.248 Laila Manzil, Gopalpet, Post Temple gate, Tellich erry - Complainant(s)

Versus

1.Accounts Officer, Telecom Revenue office of the GMT, Kannur 2. - Opp.Party(s)

28 Mar 2008

ORDER

In The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Kannur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/64/2004

K.Basheer, 30.248 Laila Manzil, Gopalpet, Post Temple gate, Tellich erry						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
1.Accounts Officer, Telecom Revenue office of the GMT, Kannur 2. 2.General Manager, Telecom Dist. 3.Public relations Officer, Telecom Dist.						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

1. GOPALAN.K 2. JESSY.M.D 3. PREETHAKUMARI.K.P

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complainant is absent. Opposite party represented. No representation for complainant. Complainant called absent. Complaint dismissed for default Sd/- President sd/- Member sd/- Member /forwarded by order/ Senior Superintendent Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur.

Complainant is absent. Opposite party represented. No representation for complainant. Complainant called absent. Complaint dismissed for default Sd/- President sd/- Member sd/- Member /forwarded by order/ Senior Superintendent Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur.

......................GOPALAN.K
......................JESSY.M.D
......................PREETHAKUMARI.K.P