Haryana

Karnal

CC/183/2015

Manjeet Kaur W/o Lakhbir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Vansh Sales - Opp.Party(s)

Narender Taneja

10 Feb 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.  

                                                          Complaint No.183 of 2015                                                                             

                                                               Date of instt.: 10.08.2015

                                                          Date of decision: 10.02.2016

 

Manjeet Kaur wife of Shri LakhbirSingh resident  of House no.2046, Sector 7, Urban Estate, Karnal..                                                                   ……..Complainant.

                                      Vs.

1.Vaansh Sales, SCO No.25, Ground Floor, Nehru Palace, Karnal through its Proprietor

2.Samsung India Electronics Pvt.Ltd. 2^nd and 3^rd and 4^th floor, Tower C, Vipul Tech Square,Golf Course Road, Gurgaon, Sector 43, through its Managing Director.

3.Samsung Service Centre, Dyal Singh Colony, Karnal , Haryana 132001, Haryana.

                                                                           ……… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer

                     Protection Act.

Before          Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.                

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

Present:        Smt.Manjeet Kaur, complainant in person.

                   Sh.Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for the Opposite partiesNo.2 and 3.               Opposite party No.1 exparte.

                  

                     Sh.Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for the Opposite Party No.1 and 2 made statement that the Opposite Parties are ready to pay Rs.36000/- as depreciated value of the fridge out of original cost of Rs.45800/-  within a period of thirty days, subject to the condition that the complainant shall return the old fridge  alongwith all accessories with the Opposite parties within ten days. Therefore, the complainant made statement for withdrawal of the complaint by submitting that having regard to the statement made by the learned counsel for the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3, she does not want to pursue with the present complaint. Statements of both the parties  recorded separately in this regard

2.                   In view of the statements made by the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. Therefore, the same stands disposed off  accordingly. The file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:10.02.2016

                                                                    (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                   President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

            (Anil Sharma ) 

               Member.