Haryana

Karnal

CC/85/2013

Bharat Singh S/o Shoran Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Yogender Kumar Mehla

14 Jan 2016

ORDER

 

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.  

                                                          Complaint No.o85 of 2013

                                                          Date of instt.: 12.2.2013

                                                          Date of decision: 14.01.2016

 

Bharat Singh son of Shri Shoran Singh resident of Ror Majra, District Karnal.

.                                                                   ……..Complainant    

                                      Vs.

1.Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Ltd. Shakti Bhawan, Panchkula through its Managing Director.

2.Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Ltd. Karnal through its Executive Engineer, Karnal.

3.SDO, “OP” Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. Nissing District Karnal.

                                                                           ……… Opposite Parties

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer

                     Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.                

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:-        None for the complainant.

                   Sh.Raj Kumar Gonder Advocate for the Opposite Parties.

ORDER:                 

                      Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, but none appeared on behalf of the complainant despite calling the case several times since morning.  On 26.8.2015, the case was fixed for evidence of the complainant for 17.9.2015.  On that day, evidence of the complainant was not present and the case was fixed for 30.10.2015 for evidence of the complainant and last opportunity was granted.  On 30.10.2015, no evidence on behalf of the complainant was produced   and the case was fixed for 22.12.2015 for evidence complainant. On 22.12.2015, the no evidence was present and the case was fixed for evidence of the complainant and it was made clear that no further date shall be given. Today, neither the complainant nor  his counsel has appeared since morning. It is already 4.00PM. Further wait is not justified. Therefore, the present complaint is dismissed in default. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:14.01.2016

                                                                    (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                   President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

            (Anil Sharma ) 

               Member.