Haryana

Sonipat

211/2013

TRIBHUVAN KAUSHIK S/O SHIVNARAYAN KAUSHIK - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. UNIEXPRESS PVT. LTD.,2. SAMEER GUPTA,3. THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

Ajay Tyagi

12 Jun 2015

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.

               

 

                                Complaint No.211 of 2013

                                Instituted on:25.04.2013

                                Date of order:12.06.2015

 

  1. Tribhuvan Kaushik S/o Shri Shivnarayan Kaushik, R/o House No. 1157, Sector 14  Sonepat.

 

                                                ...Complainant.

 

                        Versus

 

 

  1. M/s Uniexpress Pvt. Ltd., 106, Rohit House ,3 Tolstory Marg, New Delhi
  2. Sameer Gupta, Authorized Representative of M/s Uniexpress Pvt. Ltd. 106, Rohit House ,3 Tolstory Marg, New Delhi.
  3. Thai airway International Public Ltd., Upper Ground Floor American Plaza, Hotel Hilton Eros, Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019.

 

                                           ...Respondents.

 

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT,1986

 

Argued by: Sh. Rajesh Dagar, Adv. for complainant.

           Shri K.S. Solanki, Adv. For Respondent No. 1 and 2.

           Respondent No. 3 given on 14.03.2014

 

 

BEFORE     NAGENDER SINGH, PRESIDENT.

          PRABHA WATI, MEMBER.

          D.V. RATHI, MEMBER.

 

O R D E R

 

          Ld. Counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to technical defects involved in the present complaint he does not want to continue with the present complaint and thus, the present complaint may be dismissed as withdrawn and necessary permission to file the case before the appropriate court forum having competent jurisdiction may kindly be accorded. Original document be returned to the complainant after keeping photo copies of the same on the period during which proceedings remain pending before this forum be also granted.

 

          Statement recorded separately.

          Heard.

          Keeping in view the statement made by the ld counsel for the complainant the present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn and necessary permission is granted to the complainant ti file the case before the appropriate court forum having competent jurisdiction. Original documents be returned to the complainant after keeping photo copies of the same on the case file.

 

          However, the complainant would be entitled to the benefits of section 14(20 of the limitation Act for the period during which proceedings remain pending before this forum.

 

          File be consigned to the record-room.

 

 

(Prabha Wati)              (DV Rathi)                 (Nagender Singh-President)

Member DCDRF, SONEPAT     Member DCDRF, SONEPAT               DCDRF, Sonepat.

 

Announced:12.06.2015 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.