Kerala

Kannur

CC/09/85

TV Lohithakshan, S/o Anandan, 'Pratheeksha', Kizhunna, Kannur. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Trackon Couriers Pvt Ltd., C-114, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-1, New Delhi. 28. - Opp.Party(s)

22 Sep 2009

ORDER


In The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Kannur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/85

TV Lohithakshan, S/o Anandan, "Pratheeksha", Kizhunna, Kannur.
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

2. Trackon Couriers Pvt Ltd., 30 New Grang Mandi, DCM Road, Kota, Rajasthan.
3. Trackon Couriers Pvt Ltd, Arjun Hali, Station Road, Kota Jn, Rajasthan.
4. Trackon Couriers Pvt Ltd, Bellard Road, Kannur.
1. Trackon Couriers Pvt Ltd., C-114, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-1, New Delhi. 28.
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Complainant and opposite party represented. It is submitted that the earnest attempt on the aprt of opposite aprty could not succeed in recoveringtheconsignment.Since it has become impossible to recover the smart card the matter talked over b etween aprties and arrivedd atg a settlement tgaking into account the fact that it has been missed in thetransit and thereby filed memo to affect. Taking into account the situation the Forjum cosider that the smart card has beenb missed in transit. Hence on the basis of memo the complaint stands dismissd. No cost.

 

Sd/- President            Sd/- Member    Sd/- Member

 

/forwrded b y order/

 

Senior Superintendent