BEFORETHE AP. STATE CONSUMER DIPSUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: HYDERABAD

F.A.No.1081/2011 against 

Between:

J.Ramachandra,

S/o.Ganganna,

Aged about 33 years,

RPF Constable, Yeerraguntla Railway Station,

R/o.D.No.3/183, Sreeramulupeta, Yerraguntla,

Y.S.R.(Kadapa) District.

                  1.The Territorial Manager, LPG,

Bharat PetroleumKurnool Town and 

2. Vijayalakshmi Gas Agencies ,

3. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,

                                                                               Counsel              

Counsel for the Respondents       

CORAM   

AND

SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

FRIDAY, THE 

TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN

Oral Order : ( per Sri S.Bhujanga Rao, Hon’ble Member)

This appeal is directed against the order dt. 8.9.2011 of the District Forum,  

The petitioner            

           team of officials from R1 office along with R2  noticed at the accident site.

        cause shown by    

The cause shown by the petitioner for the delay is not convincing, reasonable and justifiable          

In view of the above facts and circumstances,   

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in ANSHU AGARAWAL vs. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT   condonation of delay        

The apex court in another case in BALWANTH SINGH (dead)    

               rd          

 The Apex Court              

 In the recent order reported in 1(2013) CPJ I (NC) in the case UHBVNL vs. Ramsaran and another , the 

“No doubt the words “sufficient cause” should receive liberal construction , so as to advance substantial justice.   

Having regard to the facts and circumstances discussed above  

In the result the appeal is dismissed, confirming the order of the District Forum. However,  

                                       Pm*