Kerala

Kannur

CC/09/168

KV Chandran, Chandragiri, Thottada post, Cahalakunnu, Kannur. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. The Secretary, Koyyod SC Bank, Koyyod post, Kannur. - Opp.Party(s)

16 Sep 2009

ORDER


In The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Kannur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/168

KV Chandran, Chandragiri, Thottada post, Cahalakunnu, Kannur.
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

1. The Secretary, Koyyod SC Bank, Koyyod post, Kannur.
2. MD, Kerala State Coop Consumer Federation Ltd., Gandhinagar, Kochi.
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. GOPALAN.K 2. JESSY.M.D 3. PREETHAKUMARI.K.P

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNUR

 

Present: Sri.K.Gopalan:  President

Smt.K.P.Prethakumari:  Member

Smt.M.D.Jessy:               Member

 

                                                  Dated this, the 16th day of September   2009

 

C.C.No.168/2009

 

K.K.Chandran,

Chandragiri,                                                                   Complainant

P.O.Thottada,Chalakkunnu,Kannur.

 

 

1. Secretary,

     Koyyod Service co.op.Bank,

    P.O.Koyyod

2. Managing Director,

    Kerala State Co.op.Consumer Federation,                   opposite parties

    Gandhi Nagar, Kochi.

 

.

 

          O R D E R

 

Smt.M.D.Jessy, Member

            This is a complaint filed under section12 of the consumer protection Act for getting an order directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/- with interest and cost

The case of the complainant in brief is as follows:           The opposite parties jointly provided gas connection for domestic purpose. The opposite parties offered spot connection and regular supply of gas cylinders without any delay. When complainant approached the 1st opposite party he assured that 2nd opposite party will provide gas connection on deposit of Rs.5750/- and that will be refunded in the event of termination of the gas connection. Complainant paid Rs.5750/- and availed gas connection. But later on the supply of gas happened to be irregular as against the assurance of 1st opposite party. More over the supplied refilled gas cylinders were of substandard quality and quantity. Hence the complainant cancelled the gas connection and asked for refund of the amount. 1st opposite party was not ready to refund the amount and hence the complaint.

            On receiving the complaint, notices were issued to the opposite parties. Even though opposite parties served notices they were not cared   to appear and to file their version before this Forum.  The opposite parties subsequently called absent and set exparte

On the above pleadings the following issues were raised for consideration.

1. Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties?

2. Whether the complainant is entitled for remedy as prayed in the complaint?

3. Relief and cost.

            The evidence consists of oral testimony of complainant as PW1 and Exts.A1, to A3.

Issue Nos. 1 to 3

            The complainant has stated in the complaint that he has availed gas connection from 1st opposite party by paying an amount of Rs.5750/-. The complainant was assured that the amount would be refunded at the time when the equipments are surrendered. Ext.A1 is the receipt issued by 1st opposite party which proves that the complainant has taken gas connection from opposite parties by paying an amount of Rs.5750/-.  Ext.A2 is the connection certificate. Ext.A3 is the surrendering certificate which shows the complainant has surrendered two cylinders and one regulator to 1st opposite party. Hence all the opposite parties are jointly and severally liable to refund Rs.5750/- to the complainant. Thus issues 1 to 3 are found in favour of the complainant.

                        In the result, complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/-(Rupees Five thousand Seven hundred and fifty only) to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the complainant is allowed to execute the order against the opposite parties under the provisions of consumer protection Act.

                                         Sd/-                                                Sd/-                      Sd/-

                                   President                           Member                    Member

 

                                                  APPENDIX

Exhibits for the complainant

A2.Connection certificate issued by OP

A1& A3.Receipt issued by OP dt. 1.7.99 &17.6.09

 Exhibits for the opposite parties: Nil

 

Witness examined for the complainant  

PWI.Complainant

Witness examined for the opposite parties   : Nil

 

                                                             /forwarded by order/

 

                                                              Senior Superintendent

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur  

 




......................GOPALAN.K
......................JESSY.M.D
......................PREETHAKUMARI.K.P