Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

EA/26/2013

M/s. Balaji Cotton Traders, 9-74 A, Pulladigunta, Guntur-522 017, represented by its Proprietor, V. Anjaneyulu, S/o. China Appaiah, aged 46 Years, Business, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. The Chairman & Managing Director, M/s. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Head Office, Insuranc - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. N. Srerama Murthy

02 Dec 2013

ORDER

 
Execution Application No. EA/26/2013
 
1. M/s. Balaji Cotton Traders, 9-74 A, Pulladigunta, Guntur-522 017, represented by its Proprietor, V. Anjaneyulu, S/o. China Appaiah, aged 46 Years, Business,
resident of Pulladigunta Village, Guntur-522 017.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1. The Chairman & Managing Director, M/s. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Head Office, Insurance House,
A/25/27, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi-110 002.
2. 2. The Regional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,
Regional Office,Begumpet, Snehalatha complex, Hyderabad.
3. 3. The Senior Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office-2, Main Road,
Lakshmipuram, Guntur.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD.

 

E.A.No.26/2013 in C.D.No.3/2004.

Between

 

M/s. Balaji Cotton Traders,

9-74A, Pulladigunta,

Guntur-522 017,

Represented by its Proprietor

V.Anjaneyulu, S/o.Chinna Appaiah,

Aged about 46 years, Occupation:Business,

R/o.Pulladigunta Village, Guntur-522 017.                                 .           ..Petitioner/

Complainant.

 

            And

 

1. The Chairman & Managing Director,

     M/s.The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,

     Head Office, Insurance House,

     A/25/27, Asaf Ali Road,

     New Delhi-110 002.

 

2. The Regional Manager,

     The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,

     Regional Office:Begumpet,

     Snehalatha complex, Hyderabad.

 

3. The Senior Branch Manager,

    The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,

     Branch office-2, Main Road,

     Lashmipuram, Guntur.                                                              Respondents/

                                                                                                Opp.parties.

 

Counsel the Petitioner    : Mr.N.Sreerama Murthy

 

Counsel for the Respondents:   M/s.A.Krishnam Raju

 

QUORUM:  SRI R.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE I/c. President

AND

SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER.

 

MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER,

TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN

Oral Order (Per Sri R.Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Hon’ble Incharge President)

***

       

        This is a petition filed by the petitioner/complainant U/s,.27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to  punish the respondents for non compliance of the order of this Commission.

         This Commission partly allowed the complaint vide orders dated 23-3-2007 directing the O.P.s to pay Rs.20,98,952/- with interest @ 6% pa. from the date of repudiation i.e.25/7/2003 till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paid within a period of six weeks failing which the said sum shall carry interest at 9% p.a. thereafter.

       Aggrieved by the orders of this Commission, Ops filed FA 389/2007 and complainant filed FA 520/2007 before the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and National Commission by order dated 08-4-2013 dismissed the appeal filed by opposite parties and partly modified the order of this Commission in FA 520/2007 directing the opposite parties to pay Rs.23,70,611/- with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of repudiation till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Further the National Commission observed that the Opposite parties already deposited a sum of Rs.10,24,606/- and ordered that the amount along with accrued interest be released in favour of the complainant and the opposite parties were directed to pay the balance amount with 9% p.a. interest to the complainant.

        The opposite parties deposited an amount of Rs.25,04,221/- and the complainant stated that pursuant to the orders of National Commission, he has received Rs.14,70,865/- and filed calculation memo wherein he arrived at Rs.27,34,614 as balance amount to be paid upto 25-7-2013 and filed memo of  part satisfaction.

        Thereafter, the petitioner filed E.A.I.A.No.1850/2013 to issue cheque for Rs.25,04,221- with accrued interest if any and this Commission by order dated 21-8-2013 directed to issue cheque for the said amount in favour of the petitioner.

        Heard both sides.

        The counsel for the petitioner  filed calculation memo seeking balance amount  calculating interest at 9% p.a. as per the order of National Commission dated 08-4-2013.  The calculation memo of the petitioner is as follows:

        Award amount as per the order in First

        Appeal 389/07 on the file of NCDRC                        Rs.23,70,611/-

 

        Add interest thereon at 9% p.a. on 23,70,611

        From 25-7-2003 to 09-10-2007 (DD date)               Rs  8,97,868/-

 

        Total amount payable upto 09-10-07                      Rs.32,68,479/-

 

        Amount paid through DD number 089141

        Dated 09/10/2007                                               Rs. 9,00,000/-

 

        Amount paid through DD number 089142

        Dated 09/10/2007                                               Rs. 5,70,865/-

 

                                                Total                         Rs.14,70,865/-

 

        Balance amount due upto 9-10-2007

        is Rs.32,68,479 – Rs.14,70,865/-   =                      Rs.17,97,614/-

 

        Add interest thereon at the rate of 9% p.a.

        From 09-10-07 to 25-7-13 i.e. 9 months 16 days      Rs.  9,37,000/-

 

        Total amount due as on 25-7-2013

        Rs.17,97,614/- + Rs.9,37,000/- =                          Rs.27,34,614/-

 

        Amount deposited on 25-7-2013                            Rs.25,04,221/-

 

        Balance amount due is

        Rs.27,34,614 – Rs.25,04,221 =                              Rs. 2,30,393/-

 

        Costs Rs.5,000/- + Rs.5000/-                        Rs.   10,000/-

 

        Total amount due Rs.2,30,393 + R.10,000/-            Rs. 2,40,393/-

                                                                                =========

        The respondents opposed the same and the calculation memo filed on behalf of the respondents reads as follows:

        Amount liable to be paid as per order

        Dt.08-4-2013                                                      Rs.23,70,611/-

 

        Add interest @ 9% p.a. on

        Rs.10,24,606/- (Paid) from

        25-7-2003 to 09-10-2007                                      Rs. 3,88,070/-

 

        Add interest @ 9% p.a. on

        Rs.13,46,005/- (Rs.23,70,611 – Rs.10,24,606)

        From 25-7-2003 to 25-7-2013                               Rs.12,11,405/-

        Add costs                                                           Rs.    5,000/-

                                                                                ----------------

                Total                                                         Rs.39,75,086/-

                                                                                ----------------

Amounts paid:

1.   No.089141 dt.09-10-2007                                 Rs. 9,00,000/-

2.   No.089142 dt.09-10-2007                                 Rs. 5,70,865/-

3.   No.312773 dt.25-7-2013                                   Rs.25,04,221/-

-----------------

                                Total                                         Rs.39,75,086/-

                                                                                =========

 

        We have perused carefully and gone through the calculation memos filed by both the parties.  The calculation memo filed of the respondents show that accurate interest has been calculated in terms of the order of the National Commission as also a sum of Rs.5,000/- awarded towards costs by this Commission has been added to the amount.  We do not find any discrepancy in the calculation of the amount made by the respondents and as such the E.A. is liable to be closed.

        In the result the E.A. is terminated.  There shall be no separate order as to costs.

       

    

                                                                INCHARGE PRESIDENT.

                                                                                                                                                                MEMBER.

JM                                                             Dt.02-12-2013.

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.