Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/883/2012

Smt. Khan Nurba Begum W/o. Late. Arif khan, Aged 33 Years Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.No.2-68,Tosham Village, Mandal Gudihathnur, Dist. Adilabad. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. The Bajaj Alliaz Life Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. By its Branch Manager, Collectorate Chowk Adil - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Mohd. Aleemuddin

18 Apr 2013

ORDER

 
FA No: 883 Of 2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/10/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/30/2011 of District ADILABAD)
 
1. Smt. Khan Nurba Begum W/o. Late. Arif khan, Aged 33 Years Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.No.2-68,Tosham Village, Mandal Gudihathnur, Dist. Adilabad.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1. The Bajaj Alliaz Life Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. By its Branch Manager, Collectorate Chowk Adilabad, Dist. Adilabad.
2. 2. The Bajaj Allianz Life Insuranc Company Ltd., Rep. by its Divisional Manager,
9-1-172 RK Complex Bhagathnagar beside Mamatha Theatre, Karimnagar, Dist. Karimnagar.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: ATHYDERABAD.

 

 

F.A.No.883/2012 against C.C.No.30/2011 District Forum,  

Between

 

Smt.Khan Nurba Begum W/o.late

Arif Khan, aged 33 years, Occ:

Housewife,R/o.H.No.2-68,

ToshamVillage, Mandal Gudihathnur

Dist.Adilabad.                                 

                                                                                                                                                        

1. The Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company

   

   

    

2. The Bajaj Allianz Life Insurnace Company

   

   

   

                                                                                                                       

Counsel for the Appellant      

Counsel for the Respondent:  

 

QUORUM: 

AND

SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER.

 

THRUSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL,

TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN

Order (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Hon’ble Incharge President)

***

       

Aggrieved by the order in CC 30 of 2011 on the file of District Forum, Adilabad, the complainant

            

        

       

       

         

       

                    

For reasons aforementioned, opposite parties have failed to establish by means of any documentary evidence that the insured suppressed cardiac and renal problems prior to the issuance of the policy, therefore this appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside and the complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to pay the sum assured of Rs.2,40,000/- with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of repudiation till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.3,000/- to be paid within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

In the result, this appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside and the complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to pay the sum assured of Rs.2,40,000/- with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of repudiation till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.3,000/- to be paid within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

 

 

                                                       

 

                                                                  Sd/-MEMBER.

                                                                                                 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.