Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/730/2012

1. Board of intermediate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. T. shahe Jashmi D/o. T.Shasha Peera, Minor Rep. by Next Friend Guardian/ Father T. Shasaha Peer - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Smt. Akella Padma

18 Apr 2013

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/730/2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/09/2012 in Case No. CC/145/2011 of District Anantapur)
 
1. 1. Board of intermediate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
Rep. by its secretary.
2. 2. The Regional inspction Officer, Board of Intermediate Education, A.P., At Govt. junior College for Boys Campus,
New Town, Anantapur.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1. T. shahe Jashmi D/o. T.Shasha Peera, Minor Rep. by Next Friend Guardian/ Father T. Shasaha Peera, S/o.late T. Mahaboob, D.No.1-1-850,
Working as Typist in juducial Deportment, Krupahanda Nagar, Anantapur.
2. 2. The Principal Narayana Junior College, (Examination Centre No.11017 for IPE june 2010)
Goothy Road, Anantapur.
3. 3. Sri Narahari Prasad, Chief Superintendant of Centre No. 11017 for IPE June 2010, Lecturer of Botany,
KSR, Govt., Junior College for Girls Anatapur.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.730 OF 2012 AGAINST C.C.NO.145 OF 2011 DISTRICT FORUM ANANTHAPUR

Between:

1.  Board of Intermediate Education

Government of Andhra Pradesh,

Hyderabad rep. by its Secretary

2.  The Regional Inspection Officer

Board of Intermediate Education AP

At Govt. Junior College for Boys Campus

New Town,                                              

       

1.   S/o late

Typist in Judicial Department,Ananthapur

       2.  The Principal

Narayana

(

Gooty3.  SriChief

Lecturer of Botany, KSR, Govt. Junior College for Girls

Anantapur.

                                               

Counsel for the Appellant             Counsel for the Respondent           

 

QUORUM:  

                       SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

 

  

 

Oral Order (As per Sri***

 

1.     nd

2.    st

3.     

4.    

5.    6.    

7.    

 8.   

9.    

11.   

12.

13.        However, for the laches   `2,000/-(each of the appellants and the respondents no.2 and 3 to pay`500/-) and the District Forum would receive the written version subject to payment of`3,000/- to be made by the appellant-bank to the respondent. The District Forum shall not be carried away by the observations made by this Commission.   

14.    In the result the appeal is allowed setting aside the order passed by the District Forum. The matter isThe District Forum is directed to dispose of the matter as per law after giving opportunity to both sides to lead evidence. In the circumstances, there shall 

 

                                                                               MEMBER

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     కె.ఎం.కె*

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.