Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/656/2012

Bajaj Residency Welfare Society, Bearing Regd. No. 420/2011, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Sri Bajaj Consructions, Rep. by its managing Partner, Mr. Sunkari Linga Reeddy, S/o. Raji Reddy, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. M. Kiran Kumar

16 Oct 2012

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/656/2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/08/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/14/2012 of District Rangareddi)
 
1. Bajaj Residency Welfare Society, Bearing Regd. No. 420/2011,
Plot No. 41/1 to 41/9 in Sy.No. 1/part, Srinivas Nagar Colony, Near Medipally Khaman, Medipally Village Uppal, Ranga Reddy Dist. Rep. by its President Sri G. Bhaskar Reddy
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1. Sri Bajaj Consructions, Rep. by its managing Partner, Mr. Sunkari Linga Reeddy, S/o. Raji Reddy, Aged about 56 years,
R/o. H.No.6-45/2, Bibinagar, Nalgonda Dist.
2. 2. Sri Mallagari Srinivas, S/o. Ravinder Aged about 35 years, occ: Business,
R/o. H.No. 1-91, Near Grampanchayat Office, Bibinagar,
Nalgonda
A.p
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT: HYDERABAD.

 

FA.No.656/2012  

Between:

Balaji Residency Welfare Society,

Bearing Regd.No.420/2011,

Plot No.41/1 to 41/9 in Sy.No.1/Part,

Srinivas Nagar Colony,

Near Medipally Khaman,

Medipally Village, Uppal,

Ranga Reddy District,

Rep. by its President Sri G.Bhaskar Reddy.

…Appellant/Complainant.

And

1.Sri Balaji Constructions,

  

  

  

  

  

 

2.Sri Mallagari Srinivas,

    

  

  

…Respondents/Opp.Parties.

Counsel for the Appellant              

Counsel for the Respondents

Complaint dismissed against R.1 before 

            

SMT.M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE MEMBER.

AND

SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER.


TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER,

TWO THOUSAND TWELVE.

 

Oral Order: 

 

***

This appeal is preferred by the complainant against the order of dismissal of its complaint for default.

It alleges that it had noted the date of hearing wrongly as 06.08.2012 instead of 02.08.2012.   Since the matter pertains to the year 2012 and in the light of the plea that it had wrongly noted the date of hearing, we are of the opinion that one more chance could be given to it to agitate the matter. 

In the result, the appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside.    

 

 

1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)                ________________________________

MEMBER

 

 

 

3)                ________________________________

MEMBER 

vvr 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“UP LOAD – O.K.”

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.