West Bengal

South 24 Parganas

CC/32/2015

Sri Diti Kanta Lahiri Chaudhuri. S/O Late Debi Kanta Lahiri Chaudhuri. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Sri Ajit Moy Dutta, S/O Late Hiranmoy Dutta and Late Parul Bala Dutta. - Opp.Party(s)

Sampa Chowdhury.

01 Apr 2015

ORDER

     DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPLUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

SOUTH 24 – PARGANAS , JUDGES’ COURT, ALIPORE KOLKATA-700 027

 

C.C. CASE NO. _32_ OF ___2015_____

 

DATE OF FILING : 19.1.2015_     DATE OF PASSING JUDGEMENT:_1.4.2015__

 

Present                        :   President       :   Udayan Mukhopadhyay

 

                                        Member(s)    :   Dr. (Mrs.)  Shibani Chakraborty

                                                                             

COMPLAINANT             :    Sri Diti Kanta Lahiri Chaudhuri,s/o late Debi Kanta Lahiri Chaudhuri of

                                                34, Post Office Road, Purba Putiari, P.S. Regent Park, Kolkata – 93.

 

-VERSUS  -

 

O.P/O.Ps                                 :  1. Sri Ajitmoy Dutta

                                                   2.  Sri Dipakmoy Dutta

                                                   Sons of late Hiranmoy Dutta and late Parul Bala Dutta of

                                                   1/9, Sree Colony, Post Office Regent Estate, P.S. Jadavpur, Kol-92.

                                                    3.     Sri Pintu Dutta, s/o late Hiranmoy Dutta and late Parul Bala Dutta of Ahana Apartment, 22/4, Pranabananda Road, (Kacha VIP), Garia, P.S. Patuli, Kolkata – 84.

                                                  4.     Smt. Laily Dutta, d/o late Swapan Kumar Dutta and Grand daughter of Parul Bala Dutta , C/o Amitava Saha, 10/86, Bijoygarh, P.O Regent Estate, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata – 32.

                                                 5.    M/s Shap Construction at 7/12/D, Bijoygarh, P.S. Jadavpur, Kol-32.

                                                5(i)     Sri Sumit Dutta Roy,s/o late Niranjan Dutta Roy of 7/33, Bijoygarh, Kol-32, P.S. Jadavpur.

`                                               5(ii)     Sri Prabal Roy,s/o Sri Pranab Kumar Roy, of 7/12/D, Bijoygarh, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata – 32.

                                                5(iii)   Sri Pronoy Dey  , s/o late Madhusudan Dey of 7/31, Bijoygarh, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata – 32.  

________________________________________________________________________

 

                                                            J  U  D  G  E  M  E  N  T

 

Sri Udayan Mukhopadhyay, President                                    

            This is an application under section 12 of the C.P Act filed by the complainant Sri Diti Kanta Lahiri Chaudhury  alleging deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.

            In short, the case of the complainant is that he , in search for a shop , came into contact  with the developer O.P-5 series and entered into an Agreement for sale on 4.4.2007 among them for purchasing shop no.15  on the ground floor back side of the building at premises no.109, Sree Colony, P.S Jadavpur, Kolkata – 92 measuring 112 sq.ft super built up area at a total consideration of Rs. 2,00,000/- . Accordingly complainant paid full consideration money to the O.P-developer who also delivered physical possession of the said shop room to the complainant .

            The complainant after the embargo period of 10 years from the date of mother deed dated 15.2.2000 is over requested the O.Ps for execution and registration of the sale deed but the O.Ps willfully and deliberately failed and neglected to render their services as per agreement . Several requests followed by letter dated 22.11.2014 did not yield any fruitful result and hence this case.

 

 

 

Decision with reasons

            Today is fixed for S.R. Complainant filed a track report showing that S.R was served upon all the O.Ps and O.P-5(i), 5(ii), 5(iii) already appeared and filed written version supported by an affidavit and stated that they are ready and willing to execute and register the deed of conveyance in favour of the complainant in respect of his flat as confirming party to the said deed and they have also submitted that complainant already paid full consideration money and complainant is also in possession.

            In this circumstances to expedite the matter when the complainant is ready and willing and O.P developer also likes to cooperate in this mater and land owner O.P nos. 1 to 4 remain silent inspite of service of summon, it is the duty of the Forum to see that the tears of the complainant should be meted out immediately.

Hence,

Ordered

That the application filed under section of the 12 of the C.P Act is allowed on contest against O.P-5 series and exparte against the rest.

The O.Ps are directed to execute and register the deed of conveyance in respect of the shop room mentioned in the schedule in favour of the complainant within 30 days from the date of this order, failing which, O.P nos. 1 to 4 are liable to pay compensation of Rs.25000/- and litigation cost of Rs.5000/- .

            It may be mentioned here that after the stipulated date complainant is at liberty to get the deed of conveyance executed and registered through the machinery of this Forum and in that score O.P-5 series will  stand as confirming party.

            Complainant is at liberty to recover the amount of compensation and litigation even after completion of registration if he so desire from the O.P nos. 1 to 4 because due to their unfairness and deficiency in service the complainant is not getting deed of conveyance.

Let a plain copy of this order be served upon the parties free of cost.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Member                                               President

Dictated and corrected by me

 

 

 

                        President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The judgement in separate sheet is ready and is delivered in open Forum. As it is ,

 

Ordered

That the application filed under section of the 12 of the C.P Act is allowed on contest against O.P-5 series and exparte against the rest.

The O.Ps are directed to execute and register the deed of conveyance in respect of the shop room mentioned in the schedule in favour of the complainant within 30 days from the date of this order, failing which, O.P nos. 1 to 4 are liable to pay compensation of Rs.25000/- and litigation cost of Rs.5000/- .

            It may be mentioned here that after the stipulated date complainant is at liberty to get the deed of conveyance executed and registered through the machinery of this Forum and in that score O.P-5 series will stand as confirming party.

            Complainant is at liberty to recover the amount of compensation and litigation even after completion of registration if he so desire from the O.P nos. 1 to 4 because due to their unfairness and deficiency in service the complainant is not getting deed of conveyance.

Let a plain copy of this order be served upon the parties free of cost.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Member                                               President