Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

CC/75/2012

M/S PRANAVA SURYA PLANET FLAT OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI VITTAL REDDY, S/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. SMT. CH. LAKSHMI, W/O CH. VENKATESWARA RAO, - Opp.Party(s)

MR. K. VENKAT REDDY

12 Aug 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/75/2012
 
1. M/S PRANAVA SURYA PLANET FLAT OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI VITTAL REDDY, S/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY,
R/O 64, VIMAN NAGAR, NEAR ANAND TALKIES, SECUNDERABAD.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1. SMT. CH. LAKSHMI, W/O CH. VENKATESWARA RAO,
R/O PLOT NO. 146, ROAD NO. 10, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD.
2. 2. SRI B. RAVI KUMAR, S/O MALLAIAH,
R/O FLAT NO. 402, LEGENT APARTMENTS, OPP. DEEPAK THEATER, NARAYANAGUDA,
HYDERABAD.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD.

 

C.C.No.75 of 2012

Between

 

M/s. Pranava Surya Planet Flat Owners

Welfare Association, rep. by its President,

Sri Vittal Reddy, S/o.late Narayana Reddy

Occ:Retired Employee, R/o.HJ.No.64, Viman

Nagar, Near Anand Talkies, Secunderabad.             Complainant

 

And

 

1.   Smt.Ch.Lakshmi W/o.Ch.Venkateswara

Rao, R/o.Plot No.146, Road No.10,

Jubilee Hills Hyderabad.

 

2.   Sri B.Ravi Kumar S/o.Mallaiah

Aged not known, R/o.Flat No.402,

Legend Apartments, Opp:Deepak

Theatre, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad.                Opp.Parites.

                  

Counsel for the complainant      :  Mr.K. Venkat Reddy

 

Counsel for the Opp.parties:  Notice on OP1 held sufficient

                                                  OP-served.

 

QUORUM:  SMT.M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE Incharge President

AND

SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER.

 

MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN

Order (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Hon’ble Incharge President)

***

 

         Counsel for the complainant continuously called absent inspite of giving several opportunities on 21-1-2013, 18-2-2013, 01-3-2013, 28-3-2013, 23-4-2013, 13-6-2013 and on 03-7-2013.  Despite the fact that the matter is posted under the caption of dismissal on 19-7-2013, the counsel representing the complainant submitted that the counsel for complainant is not ready and sought time and it was adjourned on payment of costs of Rs.500/- to Bar Association to 30-7-2013.  Even on 30-7-2013, the counsel for complainant was called absent and the costs imposed were not paid.  Hence the matter was posted to 12-8-2013 as a last chance on payment of costs of Rs.1000/- to Bar and posted under the same caption of dismissal but still there was no representation. 

        Hence this complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution.  There shall be no order as to costs.

 

                                                                Sd/-INCHARGE PRESIDENT.

 

                                                                Sd/-MEMBER.

JM                                                             Dt.12-8-2013.

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.