Telangana

StateCommission

CC/147/2015

1. SKT.Vishnu Srinivasam Flat Owners Welfare Association - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. SKT Constructions and Developers Bandarugudem, - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.Sarat Chandra.S

20 Mar 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Complaint Case No. CC/147/2015
 
1. 1. SKT.Vishnu Srinivasam Flat Owners Welfare Association
97 of 2015 Rep.by its President Mr.Sreekanth T.S., Aged about 49 years, Occupation Service Resident of Flat No.410, SKT.Vishnu Srinivasam, Gokul nagar, Mallapur, Hyderabad
2. 2. B.Venkateswara Rao
Aged 40 years, Occupation Service. R/o. Flat 107, SKT. Vishnu srinivasam, Gokul Nagar, Mallapur, Hyderabad.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1. SKT Constructions and Developers Bandarugudem,
Manuguru Mandal Khammam District. Rep.by its Managing Oartner, Dosapati Venkateswra Rao, Aged about 42 , R/o. H.No.7-1-223, main Road,Bandarugudem, Manuguru Mandal, Khammam Dist.
2. 2. Dosapati Venkateswara Rao
Aged 42 R/o. H.No.7-1-223, main Road,Bandarugudem, Manuguru Mandal, Khammam Dist.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 20 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

 

C.C.No. 147 of 2015  

Between:

1. S.K.T. Vishnu Srinivasam Flat Owners Welfare

    Association (97/2015) Represented by its President

    Mr.Sreekanth, T.S., Aged about 49 years,

    Occ: Service, Resident of Flat No.410, S.K.T.Vishnu

    Srinivasam, Gokul Nagar, Mallapur, Hyderabad.

 

2. B.Venkateswara Rao aged 40 years,

    Occ: Service, R/o.Flat No.107,

    S.K.T. Vishnu Srinivasam, Gokul Nagar,

    Mallapur, Hyderabad.

                                        …Complainants

 

And

 

1. S.K.T. Constructions & Developers

    Bandarugudem

    Manuguru Mandal Khammam Dist.

    Represented by its Managing Partner,

    Dosapati Venkateswara Rao, aged 42,

    R/o.H.No.7-1-223 Main Road,

    Bandarugudem, Manuguru Mandal,

    Khammam District.

 

2. Dosapati Venkateswara Rao, aged 42,

    R/o.H.No.7-1-223, Main Road,

    Bandarugudem, Manuguru Mandal,

    Khammam Dist.

…Opposite Parties

 

Counsel for the Complainants      :  M/s.Sarat Chandra Siva Lenk, Advocates     

                                           

Counsel for the Opposite Parties  : Mr.M.Hari Babu, Advocates                                              

                                                              

QUORUM: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA, PRESIDENT 

&

SRI PATIL VITHAL RAO, MEMBER

 

         MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH,

                             TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        .

Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri. B.N.Rao Nalla, President).

 

                                                         ***

This complaint is filed under section 17 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying this Commission to direct the Opposite Parties:-

1.   To arrange from Municipal Corporation for supply of drinking water by praying the necessary fee.

2.   To provide drainage connection outside the apartment and obtain the permission from the GHMC.

3.   To attend all the pipe line leakage.

4.   To arrange for water proofing of drinking water sump and arrange motor connection.

5.   To pay compensation for not providing amenities like shelves, marble flooring in main hall of each flat and common passage.

6.   To pay compensation for not providing flush tanks in common bathroom.

7.   Also to pay compensation for not providing 3 phase current meters and wiring in some flats.

8.   To provide for wall railing works and generator power wiring to individual flats.

9.   Any another relief that this Hon’ble Court deems fit along with the compensation for completing the works worth Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees forty lakh only).

 

     Counsel on both sides present.  Counsel for Complainant filed memo dated 26.02.2017 stating that the matter has been settled out of court and seeking permission to withdraw the complaint.  Hence the Complainant is permitted to withdraw the complaint.  The complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.

 

 

                                                                                  

PRESIDENT        MEMBER  

                                                                                         Dt.20.03.2017

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.