Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/727/2012

Maddi Jayalaxmi, W/o. Maddi Late Madhava rao, hindu, aged 42 Years, House hold Duties, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Shriram life insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Upstairs of Sri Sudha - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Aravala Rama Rao

22 May 2013

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/727/2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/07/2012 in Case No. CC/110/2011 of District Srikakulam)
 
1. Maddi Jayalaxmi, W/o. Maddi Late Madhava rao, hindu, aged 42 Years, House hold Duties,
Residing at Sambana Veedhi, Tekkali Town and Mandal, Srikakulam District.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1. Shriram life insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Upstairs of Sri Sudha Hotel,
Old Bus Stand, Narasannapeta, Srikakulam Town and District.
2. 2. Shriram Life Insurance Co. Ltd.,The Divisional Manager,
D.No. 1-83-27/1, Plot No.MIG-53, Sector -5, Double Road, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam-17.
3. 3. M/s. Shriram Life Insurance Company ltd., Rep. by its Assistant General Manager, Regd. Office,
3-6-478, III floor, Anand Estate, Liberty Road, Opp Indian Bank, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

A. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : ATHYDERABAD

 

 

FA 727 of 2012   

 

Between:

Maddi Jayalakshmi, W/o Maddi late Mohana Rao,

 Hindu, aged 42 years, Household duties,

residing at Sambana Veedhi,

Tekkali Town, Mandal and

Srikakulam District.   

And

 

1.  Shriram Life Insurance Company Ltd., rep by its Branch Manager,

Branch Office, Upstairs of Sri Sudha Hotel, Old bus stand,

Narasannapeta, Srikakulam Town and District.

 

2.  Shriram Life Insurance Company Ltd., rep by its Divisional manager, Divisional Office, Door No.1-83-27/1, Plot No.M1G -53, , Sector-5, M.V.P. Double Road, M.V.P.Colony, Visakhapatnam-530017.

 

3.      

                               

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant                         

 

Counsel for the Respondents

 

 

Coram                                  

 

And

                                             

 

Wednesday, the Twenty Second Day of May

Two Thousand Thirteen

 

         

                                                                       

 

****

 

 

 

1.   The appeal in FA 727/2012 was preferred by the complainant in 

2.           The brief facts of the complaint  Maddi Madhava Rao, during his life time obtained 

 

3.          

The complainant is not a consumer.

99

     

 

  

 

6.            

 

7.               

 

8.    

 

9.           There is no dispute that thecomplainant’s husband M.Madhava Rao submitted proposal forms for issuance of two Shri Plus policies bearing Nos .LN 110600111522 and LN 110700000514 for Rs.3,00,000/- each from the Opposite party on 20.12.006 and paid Rs.10,000/- each towards premium and that the            

 

10.       In the result, the appeal is

 

 

 

MEMBER

 

MEMBER

 

Dated : 22.05.2013.

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.