Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/08/427

SARJU CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. SANJAY KAPOORCHAND JAIN - Opp.Party(s)

S.V.PUROHIT

30 Jan 2014

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR
5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001
 
First Appeal No. A/08/427
(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/04/2008 in Case No. CC/07/136 of District Nagpur)
 
1. SARJU CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,
OFFICE AT RISHABH APARTMENT, AZAMSHAH LAYOUT, GANESH NAGAR, GREAT NAG ROAD, NAGPUR 440009 THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI PRAVIN S/O MAYABHAI PATEL
NAGPUR
Maharastra
2. 2. SHRI. PRAVIN S/O MAYABHAI PATEL,
R/O. INDRADEVI TOWN, NANDANVAN WATHODA, NAGPUR.
NAGPUR
MAHARASHTRA
3. 3. SHRI. KAMLESH S/O PRANLAL SHAH,
R/O. INDRADEVI TOWN, NANDANVAN WATHODA, NAGPUR.
NAGPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1. SANJAY KAPOORCHAND JAIN
RESIDENT OF TENANT NO. 54, INDRADEVITOWN, WATHODA MIDDLE RING ROAD, WATHODA,NAGPUR
NAGPUR
Maharastra
2. 2. SHRI. DEORAO S/O GANPAT KAORE,
-
3. 3. SMT. SUSHILA KAORE,
BOTH RESIDENT OF C/O SHRI. PRAVIN PATIL, INDRADEVI TOWN, NANDANWAN WATHODA, NAGPUR.
NAGPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. B.A.Shaikh PRESIDING MEMBER
  HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Adv. Mr S V Purohit
 ......for the Appellant
 
None for Respondent No.1
Adv. Mr A Z Garde for Respondent Nos.2 & 3
 ......for the Respondent
ORDER

(Passed on 30.01.2014)

 

Per Mr B A Shaikh, Hon’ble Presiding Member

 

          Adv. Mr S Purohit is present for the appellants.  None is present for the respondent No. 1 though on last date Adv. Mr Kalria had appeared for respondent No.1.  Adv. Mr A Z Gharde appeared for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 and filed his power jointly with Adv Mr R B Hinganikar today. 

          Adv. for the appellants filed an application to withdraw this appeal bearing No. A/08/427.  He also filed alongwith said application an affidavit of respondent No.1 and submits that both the parties have arrived at settlement outside the Commission and therefore the appellants want to withdraw the appeal.

           In view of the said submission the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 

          The amount, if any, deposited by the appellants be refunded to the appeal as the respondent in his affidavit has given “No Objection” to withdraw the amount.

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. B.A.Shaikh]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.