Haryana

Sonipat

09/2015

RAMESH KHATRI S/O JAI RAM - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. S.E. UHBVNL LTD.,2. XEN UHBVNL LTD.,3. SDO UHBVNL. - Opp.Party(s)

RAMESH KHATRI

31 Jul 2015

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.

               

 

                                                                                                                Complaint No.cc/09 of 2015

                                Instituted on:12.01.2015

                                Date of order:18.08.2015

 

Ramesh Khatri S/o Jai Ram, R/o Village garhi Bramanan Ward No. 30, District Soneapt.

                                                     ……Complainant

 

                     VERSUS

 

1.S.E. U.H.B.V.N.L. city Sonepat.

 

2.Xen U.H.B.V.N.L. District Sonepat.

 

3. S.D.O. UHBVNL City, Sonepat, District Sonepat.

     ……Respondents.

 

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF       

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT,1986

 

Argued by: Complainant in person.

           Shri Neeraj Malik, Adv. For Respondents.

          

          

 

BEFORE     NAGENDER SINGH, PRESIDENT.

          PRABHA WATI, MEMBER.

          D.V. RATHI, MEMBER.

 

O R D E R

 

           Ld. Counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to technical defects involved in the present complainant he does not want to countinue with the present complaint and thus, the present complaint may be dismissed as withdrawn and necessary permission to file the case before the proper court may kindly be accorded. The time spent during the pendency of the present complaint may also kindly be condoned. Original documents be also returned.

 

          Statement recorded separately.

          Heard.

          Keeping in view the statement made by the ld. Counsel for the complainant, the present complainant stands dismissed as withdrawn and necessary permission is granted to the complainant to file the case before the proper court. Original documents be returned to the complainant after keeping photo copies of the same of the case of file.

          However, the complainant would be entitled to the benefits of section 14(2) of the limitation Act for the period during which proceedings remain pending before this Forum.

File be consigned to the record-room.

 

 

(Prabha Wati)        (DV Rathi)                 (Nagender Singh-President)

Member DCDRF        Member DCDRF                   DCDRF, Sonepat.

 

Announced:18.08.2015