BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

C.C.No.215 of 2014   

Between:

M/s.Vinay Textiles,

Rep. by its Proprietor, Chiluka Sukanya,

W/o.Ch.Prabhakar,

Aged about 47 years, Occ: Business,

R/o.Plot No.70, Textile Park, Baddenapally Village,

Siricilla Mandal, Karimnagar District, Telangana State.

                                     …Complainant

And

1. S.B.I. General Insurance Company Ltd.,

    3^rd Floor, Ozone Commercial Complex,

    6-3-669/1, Panjagutta Main Road, Hyderabad – 500082.

2. United India Insurance Company Ltd.,

    H.No.6-5-96/1, Opposite R.T.A. Office,

    Vidhya Nagar, Sircilla-Karimnagar Dist. – 505301.

3.* The State Bank of Hyderabad,

    Rep. by its Regional Manager,

    Regional Office at Dr.Ambedkar Road,

    Karimnagar, Telangana State.

4. * The State Bank of Hyderabad,

    Rep. by its Chief Manager,

    Sircilla Branch, at Sircilla

    Karimnagar District, Telangana State.

*Implead petition i.e., CCIA.No.149/2015 allowed

On 09.12.2016.

         …Opposite Parties

Counsel for the Complainant        : M/s.Bethi Venkateshwarlu, Advocates        

Counsel for the Opposite Party No.1 : M/s.K.Madhusudhan Reddy, Advocates

Counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 : M/s.Valluri Mohan Srinivas, Advocates 

Counsel for the Opposite Party No.3 & 4: Mr.K.Narayana Rao, Advocate                                 

QUORUM: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA, PRESIDENT 

                                                   &

SRI PATIL VITHAL RAO, MEMBER

         WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY,

                               TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri. B.N.Rao Nalla, President).

                                                   ***

This complaint is filed under section 17 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying this Commission:

(a)        To pay a sum of Rs.86,51,000/- (Rupees eighty six lakh fifty one thousand only) towards loss occurred to the textile mill and another sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakh only) towards damages and for mental agony sustained by the Complainant and her family.

(b)        To award costs of this complaint.

      No representation for Complainant.  Counsel for Opposite Party No.1 and 2 present.  No representation for Opposite Party No.3 and 4.  As per the docket orders dated 17.01.2017 there has been no representation on behalf of the Complainant.  He is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter.  It appears that the Complainant is not interested in prosecuting the complaint any further.  Amendment not carried out and fair copy not filed. In the circumstances the matter was ordered to be posted under the caption “For Dismissal” and the same is posted to this day.  In spite of that there is no representation on behalf of the Complainant today.  Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.

PRESIDENT           MEMBER  

                                                                              Dt.25.01.2017