BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :HYDERABAD.

F.A.No.781/2011 against Guntur.

Between:

M/s. The NewIndia

Rep. by its Divisional Manager,

4/1,Arundelpet,Guntur,

Guntur District.                                                                     

1.Ratnam Tobaccos,

2. Thiyyagura Koti Reddy,

                                                           Counsel for the Appellant          

Counsel for the Respondents                                                     

TWO THOUSAND THIRTEEN.

Oral Order 

           This appeal is directed against the order dt.16.3.2011     

           For the sake of  

The proprietor of the first complainant,  cents     dt.26.10.91. Later, they                

 The opposite party     after accident, the claim intimation, claim forms and other documents           submitted to the opposite party and requested the opposite party to settle the claim as soon as possible. After keeping quiet for a long period , the opposite party sent a letter dt. 31.7.2008      

                 Therefore the said policy is      

         finding of the District Forum    

                 26.5.2004 to 25.5.2005 and by the date of issuing the said policy, the insured is no more as he admittedly died on 2.8.2003. It is not       

It is true that the opposite parties settled the claim regarding   Simply because                 

It is the case of the             

In view of the above facts and circumstances, we are of the firm view that there is no deficiency in service  

                                                       Pm*