Haryana

Sonipat

EA67/2014

UMED SINGH S/O PURAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. PRO. DAHIYA AGRICULTURE CLINIC,2. CHEMINOVA INDIA LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

R.S.DAHIYA

14 Jan 2015

ORDER

Umed Singh V/s Dahiya Agricalture Clinic

Case no. EA/67/2014

 

Present:      Complainant –DH in person

                    Sh. Joginder Kuhar Counsel for Respondent no. 2

             

Order :

Statement of the complainant and counsel for the respondent no. 2 regarding receipt and deposit of cheque no. 053683 dt. 24.03.2015 for Rs. 55000/- has been recorded separately.

The complainant has also stated that he does not want to continue with the present complaint and thus, it may be dismissed as withdrawn

Statement recorded separately.

Keeping in view the statement made by the complainant-DH, the present execution petition stands dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied.

File be consigned after due compliance.

         

(Prabha Wati)      (D.V. Rathi)            (Nagender Singh)

Member, DCDRF      Member, DCDRF           president, DCDRF

Sonepat            Sonepat                      Sonepat

Dated :01.04.2015

 

     

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.