Maharashtra

Pune

CC/16/910

सागर विलास काटे - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Pickme Esolutions India Pvt Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

27 Jun 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PUNE AT PUNE
NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 04TH FLOOR, B-WING
OPP. COUNCIL HALL, NEAR SADHU WASWANI CHOWK,
PUNE - 411001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/910
 
1. सागर विलास काटे
सर्व्हेल. नं. 648, बी 91 सुपर इंदिरानगर बिबवेवाडी पुणे 411 037
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1. Pickme Esolutions India Pvt Ltd
303 Puanll s capitol Ghodbandar Road Opp. Hypercity Thane Maharashtra
2. 2. Manager
303 Puanll s capitol Ghodbandar Road Opp. Hypercity Thane Maharashtra
3. 3. Pickme esolutions India Pvt. Ltd
303 Puanll s capitol Ghodbandar Road Opp. Hypercity Thane Maharashtra
4. 4. Manager
303 Puanll s capitol Ghodbandar Road Opp. Hypercity Thane Maharashtra
5. 5. Telephone Shoppee
Sadashiv Peth shop o. Near B Dnyanprabhodini Pune
6. 6. Manager
Sadashiv Peth shop o. Near B Dnyanprabhodini Pune
7. 7.Telephone Shoppee
Sadashiv Peth shop o. Near B Dnyanprabhodini Pune
8. 8. Manager
Sadashiv Peth shop o. Near B Dnyanprabhodini Pune
9. 9. Nokia Company
Vatika Business centre Suite No. 6 Level 5 C wing Tech park 1 Airport Road Yerwada Pune 411 006
10. 10. Manager
Vatika Business centre Suite No. 6 Level 5 C wing Tech park 1 Airport Road Yerwada Pune 411 006
11. 11. Nokia company
Vatika Business centre Suite No. 6 Level 5 C wing Tech park 1 Airport Road Yerwada Pune 411 006
12. 12. Manager
Vatika Business centre Suite No. 6 Level 5 C wing Tech park 1 Airport Road Yerwada Pune 411 006
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENT
  Onkar G. Patil MEMBER
  Kshitija Kulkarni MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 27 Jun 2017
Final Order / Judgement

ORAL ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. V. P. Utpat, President

          None present for Complainant even on second call.  Today Complainant failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  Perusal of order-sheet reveals that Complainant was absent even on previous date viz. 30/03/2017.  By an earlier order dated 04/02/2017 passed by this Forum, Complainant was directed to take appropriate steps for service of notices to the unserved Opposite Parties by furnishing correct present postal addresses of such unserved Opposite Parties.  However, till today Complainant has failed to comply with said order for the reasons best known to him.  Thus, in these circumstances, it does appear to this Forum that Complainant has lost his interest in further prosecution of present consumer complaint.  In such circumstances, it is not desirable to prolong the case.  Hence, consumer complaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution in accordance with provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  Parties shall bear their own costs.

Pronounced and dictated on Tuesday, June 27, 2017

 
 
[ V. P. UTPAT]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Onkar G. Patil]
MEMBER
 
[ Kshitija Kulkarni]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.