A. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : ATHYDERABAD

FA 311 of 2012   

Between :

The OV Class Employees Association,Rep.byMr.S/o B.

Janardhan 

And

01.MunnangiS/o

Watchman, Social Welfare HostelCherukuruPrakasam

02.Ch.S/o

R/o S. 

03.P.S/o

R/o 18^thNearKandukur,

Counsel for the Appellant  

Counsel for the Respondents 

Coram                              

And

Thursday, the Fourth Day of July

Two Thousand Thirteen

****

2.           The brief facts of the case are as       

3.           The Ops 1 and 2 did not choose to contest the matter whereas OP 3 filed counter disputing the claim and contended that plot no. 143 was not at all allotted to the complainant and that he is not in possession of the same. The complainant did not pay Rs.2730/- to the Ops as alleged and  

4.           After considering Ex. A1 to A3 and hearing both sides the District Forum vide its order

5.           Thereafter the complainant filed     

6.           The District Forum vide orders dated 16.3.2012 

7.           As against the said orders the OP. 1 filed this appeal and mainly contended that the order of the District Forum is ex facie   

8.           Counsel for R-1/complainant 

9.           Now, the point for consideration is, whether the impugned order of the District Forum is vitiated either in law or on facts?

10.        There is no dispute that District Forum vide its order     

11.        In the result, the appeal is dismissed confirming the order of the District Forum. There shall be no order as to costs.