BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT  HYDERABAD.

CC  127 of 2012

Between:

1)  Sarikonda Prashanth

S/o.  S. Venkata Raju

2)  Smt. Kolahalam Naga Jyothi

W/o. Sarikonda Prashanth

Both are R/o. Flat No. 203

Plot No. 203/A, Sai Balaji Residency

Opp: DPR Towers, Jayanagar

KPHB, Hyderabad-500 072.                        ***               Complainants

                                                                   And

1)  M/s. Srinivas Infra

At Plot No. 11, 22 & 33

Sy. No. 960 & 961

Beeramguda, Patancheru (M)

Medak Dist.

Rep. by its Managing  Partners.

2)  T. Srinivasulu

Partner, M/s. Srinivas Infra

Flat No. G1, Plot No. 33

Yamuna Residency

Raghavendra Colony

Beeramguda, Ameenpoor (V)

Patancheru (M)

Medak Dist.

3)  P.N.S. Chandrasekhar

Partner, M/s. Srinivas Infra

R/o. Plot No. 111,

Jaya Lakshmi Nagar Colony

Ramachandrapuram

Hyderabad-502 032.                                    ***             Opposite Parties

Counsel for the Complainants :                  M/s. Md. Ghouse Pasha

Counsel for the Opposite Parties :               For Paper Publication. 

CORAM:     

            HON’BLE SRI  JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, PRESIDENT

                            SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

&

                             SRI  S. BHUJANGA RAO,  HON’BLE MEMBER

Oral Order :  21/03/2014 

(Per Hon’ble Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada, President)

                                                                   ***

1)                On 27.1.2014 in the morning when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the complainant was absent.  Accordingly, the matter was passed over.  Again in the afternoon he was absent.    In those circumstances, we directed the matter to be listed again on 10.3.2014. 

2)                 On 10.3.2014 when the matter was called in the morning counsel for the complainant was absent.    Accordingly, the matter was passed over.    In the afternoon also counsel for the complainant called absent.    In those circumstances, we were constrained to list the matter in the caption of ‘FOR DISMISSAL’.

3)                 Today, when the matter is called in the morning, the counsel for the complainant is absent, and accordingly the matter is passed over.   Again in the afternoon the counsel is absent.    In those circumstances, we have no option except to dismiss the complaint.   Accordingly, this complaint is dismissed.  No costs. 

1)      _______________________________

PRESIDENT        

2)           ________________________________

MEMBER  

3)           ________________________________

MEMBER  

*pnr