Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

EA/06/2021

T.Jeyadevi W/o Late S. S. Durairaj - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. M/s. LION L.M.Vyas Memorial General Surgical Clinic - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. S.Suresh

04 Jan 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

E.A. No.06/2021 in

O.P. No.37/2004

                         DATED THE 04^TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022

 

Mrs. T. Jeyadevi,

W/o. Late S. Durairaj,

No.4/4, 3^rd Cross Street,

Rayala Nagar,

Ramapuram,

Chennai – 600 089.                                                           .. Decree Holder/ Complainant.

 

-Versus-

 

1. M/s. Lion L.M. Vyas Memorial General Surgical Clinic,

No.7, Venkatnarayana Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.

 

2. M/s. Apollo Hospital Enterprise Limited,

Represented by its Managing Director,

No.21, Greams Lane,

Chennai.

 

3. Dr. Senthilkumar,

Anaesthetist,

M/s. Lion L.M. Vyas Memorial General Surgical Clinic,  

No.7, Venkatnarayana Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.                                     E.A. against JD3 is dismissed dt.29.11.2021.

                                           

                                                                           .. Judgement Debtors / Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the Decree Holder/ Complainant  : M/s. S. Suresh

Judgement Debtors / Opposite parties 1 & 2   : No Order as against the Opposite                                       

                                                                           parties 1 & 2

 

This petition is coming up before us on 04.01.2022 for appearance of the Decree Holder / Complainant and for further Orders and this Commission made the following order in Open Court:                                                                                                

 

 

Docket order

 

No representation for Decree Holder / Complainant. Today, this matter is posted for appearance of Decree Holder / Complainant and for further orders.  When the matter was called at 10.45 A.M., there was no representation for Decree Holder / Complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 P.M. the Decree Holder / Complainant was again not present.  Since the Decree Holder / Complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the Execution Application is closed.   No costs.

 

               Sd/-                                                                                                          Sd/-                                                           

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT