STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
OF TELANGANA : AT HYDERABAD
CC NO. 09 OF 2015
Between :
Michael Domnic Julius S/o Freddy Julius
Aged abou 36 years, R/o H.No.11-5-348,
Flat No.209 (303), Arun Apts., Red Hills
-
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO. 10 OF 2015
Between :
Shakeel Ahmed S/o Nasiruddin Ahmed
Aged about 30 years, R/o Plot No.83,
H.No.5-35-/198/2, Shaktipuram,
Prasanthi Nagar, IE Kukatpally
Hyderabad-500072
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO. 12 OF 2015
Between :
- Ankur Mittal S/o Anil Kumar Mittal
Aged about 34 years
- Smt Shaloo Mittal W/o Ankur Mittal
Aged about 34 years
Both are R/o Flat No.108, Pentagaon
Amrutha Valley, Road NO.12, Banjara Hills
Hyderabad-500034
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO. 16 OF 2015
Between :
Sangeeth Velekat S/o VR Arunan
Aged 37 years, Occ: Software Engineer
R/o No.51, 1st A Cross, 3rd Main
Domlur 2nd Stage, Bangalore-560071
…Complainant
A N D
- Aliens Developers Private Limited
Regd. Off: Flat No.911, Teja Block
My Home Navadweepa Apartments,
Madhapur, Hyderabad-500081 rep. by
Its Managing Director, Hari Challa
S/o CVR Chowdhary
- Joint Managing Director, Venkata Prasanna Challa
S/o CVR Chowdhary Both R/o of Flat No.910
Teja Block, Myh Home Navadweepa Apartments
Madhapur, Hyderabad-500081
… Opposite Parties
CC NO. 23 OF 2015
Between :
- Vivek Kale S/o Amaranath Kale
R/o C-71, Madhuranagar
Hyderabad-500038
- Mrs Sushmitha Kale, W/o Vivek Kale
R/o Madhuranagar, Hyderabad-500038
(at present in USA)
- Amanath Kale S/o Narayanarao Kale
R/o C-71 Madhuranagar
Hyderabad-500038
General Power of of Vivek Kale & Sushmitha Kale
(Son and Daughter –in-Law of Amaranath Kale
R/o 362, Neponset, St.Canton MA02021 USA
GPA on 13.12.2014, Nellya, Lorez Benavides Notery Public
Commonwelth of Massachusetts USA As GPA
Mr.Amaranath Kale is representing on behalf of complainants
…Complainant
A N D
- M/s Alliens Developers (P) Ltd.,
Regd. Company under Companies Act, 1956
R/p by its Managing Director and Joint
Managing Director Mr.Hari Challa S/o CVR Chowdary
Off: Flat No.910, Teja Block, My Home Navadeepa Apts.,
Madhapur, Hi-Tech City, Hyderabad-500081
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
… Opposite Parties
CC NO. 24 OF 2015
Between :
A.Padmavathi W/o A.Murali Krishna
Aged about 51 years R/o HIG-427, 9GF
Phase-1, Madhava Nagar, BHEL
-
(Present address C/o Mr.VV Sharma
R/o Flat No.303, III Floor, Plot No.1-55/A
Akshaya Residency, Madinaguda,
-
…Complainant
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO. 30 OF 2015
Between :
- Zaheen Mahaey S/o Dr.Raj Kumar Mahaey
Aged about 32 years
- Mrs Pooja Arora W/o Zaheen Mahaey
Aged about 30 years,
R/o Flat No.A1/7, Prasanth Apartments
Sindhi Colony, PG Road-3, Secunderabad-500003
(Present address Flat No.401, Tulip Block
Bhanu Town Ship, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500049)
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO. 38 OF 2015
Between :
Dinesh Jeswani S/o Shri Shobraj Jeswani
Aged about 39 years, Occ: Private Employee
R/o Flat No.102, Mehak Residency
12-2-833/1, MIGH Colony, Mehdipatnam
-
…Complainant
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers Private Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, Regd.Off: Space Station No.1
Gachibowli, Tellapur, Hyderabad
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers Private Ltd
Regd.Off: Space Station No.1
Gachibowli, Tellapur, Hyderabad
- Mr. Venkat Prasanna Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers Pvt Ltd
Regd.Off: Space Station No.1
Gachibowli, Tellapur, Hyderabad
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.63 OF 2015
Between :
- Sethuraman Kuppuswamy (NRI)
S/o Kuppuswamy Venkataraman
Aged about 39 years,
- Mrs Loka Kalyanai Sankar (NRI)
W/o Sethuraman Kuppuswamy
Aged about 37 years, R/o 1063 Morse
Avenue Apartment 2103 Sunnyvale
California-94089, USA
(Present Address 1410, Westmont, Avenue Cambell
California-95008 USA)
Rep. by their GPA Kuppuswamy Venkataraman
S/o lat R.Venkataraman Aged about 64 years
Ret. Bank Officer R/o 3-6-497, Flat No.204,
Sai Krupa Apts., Street NO.7, Himayatnagar
-
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.70 OF 2015
Between :
- Patlur Philip Rajan S/o Mr.Padmakar Rajan Patlur
Aged about 35 years
- Mrs Kirti Philip Patlur W/o Patlur Philip Rajan
Aged about 33 years
R/o 4-1-1/17, King Koti, Opp: AP Vardhaman Bank
-
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.75 OF 2015
Between :
- Mayank Dinesh Kulshrestha S/o Dinesh Chandra
Aged about 30 years, Occ: Service
R/o Flat No.308, Block No.D.SriKalki Heights
Manjeera Pipeline Road, Madinaguda
Hyderaad-50
- Anuja Kulshrestha W/o Mayank Dinesh Kulshrestha
Aged about 27 years, Occ; housewife
R/o Flat No.308, Block No.D.SriKalki Heights
Manjeera Pipeline Road, Madinaguda
Hyderaad-50
…Complainants
A N D
Aliens Developers Pvt Ltd.,
Reg. off flat NO.911, Teja Block
My Home Navadweepa Apartments
Madhapur, Hyderabad-81, rep. by its
Managing Director and Associate
Vice President Mr.Alaparthi Appa Rao
And P.Panduranga Rao, Asst Manager
(Finance & Accounts
Present Address: Aliens Space Station,
Gachibowli Tellapur, Hyderabad
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.86 OF 2015
Between :
- Mrs Jagriti Dawra W/o Avinash Vijay
Aged about 37 years, Occ: Pvt Employee
- Mr.Avinash Vijay S/o Brij Kumar Vijay
Aged about 42 years, Occ: Pvt Employee
R/o C/o Jagrook Dawra, Flat No.103
Medha Towers, Attapur, Hyderabad-500048
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers Private Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director
And Joint Managing Director Venkat
Prasanna Chall
- Hari Challa S/o CVR Chowdary
Managing Director of M/s Aliens Dvelopers
Private Limited
- Venkat Prasanna Challa S/o CVR Chowdary
Joint Managing Director of M/s Aliens Developers
Private Limited
Address: Aliens Space Station-1
Village and Post-Tellapur, Mandal Ramachandrapuram
Dist: Medak-502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.87 OF 2015
Between :
- Mrs Kanupriya Katyal W/o Jagrook Dawra
Aged about 38 years, Occ: Professor
- Jagrook Dawra S/o Hardayal Dawra
Aged about 41 yesr, Professor
R/o Flat No.103, Medha Towers
Attapur, Hyderabad
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers Private Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director
And Joint Managing Director Venkat
Prasanna Chall
- Hari Challa S/o CVR Chowdary
Managing Director of M/s Aliens Dvelopers
Private Limited
- Venkat Prasanna Challa S/o CVR Chowdary
Joint Managing Director of M/s Aliens Developers
Private Limited
Address: Aliens Space Station-1
Village and Post-Tellapur, Mandal Ramachandrapuram
Dist: Medak-502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.88 OF 2015
Between :
Kuldeep Raizada S/o Kushal Swarup Raizada
Aged 35 years, Occ: Business
R/o 8-1-284/OU Colony, Shaikpet Hyderabad-8
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director
And Joint Managing Director Off at Flat NO.911
Teja Block, My Home Navadeep Apartments
Madhapur, Near Hitech City, Hyderabad-500081
- Hari Chall S/o CVR Chowdhary
Aged about 36 years, Occ: Managing Director
M/s Aliens Developers (P) Ltd., Flat No.910
Teja Block, My Home Navadeep Apartments
Madhapur, Near Hitech City, Hyderabad-500081
- Challa Venkat Prasanna S/o CVR Chowdhary
Aged 35 years, Off: Joint Managing Director
M/s Aliens Developers Flat No.910
Teja Block, My Home Navadeep Apartments
Madhapur, Near Hitech City, Hyderabad-500081
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.93 OF 2015
Between :
Kota Vamshi Kanth S/o Kota Ghnaneshwar
Aged about 32 years, R/o Plot No.39, Street No.3
Karthikeya Nagar Nacharam
-
(Present Address Plot No.23, Street NO.1
Veerareddy Colony, Nacharam, Hyderabad-500076)
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.94 OF 2015
Between :
Chaganty Venkata Ramana Kumar S/o CV Subba Rao
Aged about 50 years, R/o Flat No.A1302, Plot No.255
Swarajlimperial Sector 10 Kharghar, Navi Mumbia-410210
Permanent Add: D.No.5-25-14/8, Flat No.2,
-
Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam-530013)
…Complainant
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.101 OF 2015
Between :
- Abhishek Kapoor S/o Pankaj Kapoor
Aed about 38 years
- Mrs Soniya Kapoor W/o Abhishek Kapoor
Aged about 35 years,
R/o Flat No.71/1, Aster Vatika City Shona Road
Sector 49, Gurgon-122018, Haryana
(Present Add 7 Elderberry Lane
Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA-06877)
(Permanent Add: Flat NO.7H Block 2, Lake District
74/1, Narkeldanga Main Road, Kolkata-700054
West Bengal)
…Complainants
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.138 OF 2015
Between :
Mangu Lakshmi Kanth S/o Mangu Sri Ramakrishna Rao
Aged about 33 years, Occ: Software Professional
R/o Unit-7, 52, Station Street (East), Harris Park
Sydney, NSW-2150, rep. by his father and
GPA Holder Mangu Sri Ramakrishna Rao
S/o Mangu Lakshmaji Rao, aed about 58 years
Occ: Employee, R/o New NGO Qr No.5, ARI Campus
Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad-030
…Complainant
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, Corp. Off: Tellapur Space Station
Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Medak Dist.502032
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Tellapur Space Station
Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Medak Dist.502032
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Tellapur Space Station Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist.502032
… Opposite Parties
CC NO.226 OF 2015
Between :
Sumit K Tiwary S/o Arjun Tiwary
Aged about 34 years, R/o 165/B, Gunrock
Enclave, Phase-2, Secunderabad-500009
(Present Add: 1001 Rupley Rd., APT 210
Camp Hill PA 17011, USA)
…Complainant
A N D
- M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director & Joint Managing Director
Mr. Hari Challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary &
Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Respectively, O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. Hari challa, S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
- Mr. C. Venkat Prasanna, , S/o Mr. CVR Chowdhary,
Joint Managing Director, M/s. Aliens Developers (P) Ltd
O/o Flat No. 910, Teja Block,
My Home Navadeepa Apartments, Madhapur,
Near Hitech City, Hyderabad - 500081.
(Present addresses of parties s.no. 1 to 3 are at
Aliens space station, Tellapur post,
Ramachandrapuram Mandal,
Medak Dist, Hyderabad – 502032
… Opposite Parties
Counsel for the Complainants : Sri V.Appa Rao, Sri A.Naveen Kumar
Sri K.Parandhama Chari, Sri G Chandra
sekhar Rao, Sri T.Satyanarayana, Dr.
Sirisha Anumula, Sri Ramalaxma Reddy
M/s Gopi Rajesh Associates
Counsel for the Opp. parties : M/s P.Raja Sripathi Rao
QUORUM :
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO, PRESIDENT
&
SRI PATIL VITHAL RAO, MEMBER
FRIDAY THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN
Oral Order : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla, Hon’ble President)
***
The complaints arise out of identical facts and similar circumstances, as such, they are disposed of by common order. The complaint, CC No.09/2015 is taken as lead case.
2. The case of the Complainants in brief, is that the Opposite party No.1 company represented to them that they are engaged in the business of constructing multistoried apartments and entered into development agreement with the owners of the land comprised in survey nos. 384, 385 and 426/A situate at Tellapur village, Ramchandrapur Mandal, Medak district to construct high rise apartments under the name and style of ‘Aliens Space Station-I’ and obtained permission bearing No.HUDA/621/P4/PLG/HMDA(HUDA)/2008 and they would provide all amenities there for, possession by certain period of time as detailed in the table below with a grace period and on such representation of the opposite parties, the complainants entered into agreement of sale for purchase of flats, having super built-up area with one car parking along with undivided share of land, the details of which are shown in the table below.
3. The complainants entered into agreements of sale/reservation in respect of flats at Aliens Space Station, situate at Tellapur village, Ramachandrapuram mandal, Medak district for the consideration thereof as detailed in the table below:
Case number | Flat number | Station | Area in Sft. | Un-divided share | (in Rs.) Total consideration | Amount paid (in Rs) | Date of Agreement | Date of completion/ grace period |
09/2015 | 1829 on 18th floor | No.5 | 1254 | 29.96 sq.yds | 40,70,709/- | 19,09,777/- | 19.11.2009 | Within 3 years/6 months |
10/2015 | 1844 on 18th floor | No.7 | 1687 | 29.03 sq.yds | 61,84,965/- | 19,40,000/- | 01.12.2012 | Dec’2014 |
12/2015 | 802 on 8th floor | No.1 | 1597 | 34.34 sq.yds | 41,50,003/- | 20,10,053/- | 10.02.2010 | Dec’2011/6 months |
16/2015 | 341 on 3rd floor | No.7 | 2400 | - | 53,80,573/- | 31,02,201/- | 12.11.2006 | Sep’2013 |
23/105 | 719/ on 7th floor | No.3 | 2150 | 46.23 sq.yds | 53,22,765/- | 29,82,530/- | 09.03.2011 | Nov’2011 / 9 months |
24/2015 | 844 on 8th floor | No.7 | 1687 | 36.27 sq.yds | 46,59,725/- | 24,50,000/- | 27.06.2009 | Within 3 years / 6 months |
30/2015 | 1647 on 16th floor | No.8 | 1687 | 36.27 sq.yds | 56,76,031/- | 28,17,010/- | 12.05.2012 | March 2014 / 6 months |
38/2015 | 1627 on 16th floor | No.5 | 1792 | 38.53 sq.yds | 49,49,733/- | 20,00,000/- | 22.09.2010 | Feb’2012/3 months |
63/2015 | 544 on 5th floor | No.7 | 1687 | 36.27 sq.yds | 49,21,297/- | 28,82,957/- | 16.08.2008 | Within 3 years/6 months |
70/2015 | 735 on 7th floor | No.6 | 1538 | 33.07 sq.yds | 44,69,739/- | 31,55,497/- | 23.12.2011 | Dece’2012 / 6 months |
75/2015 | 1272(B) on 12(B) floor | No.12 | 1874 | 40.29 sq.yds | 52,28,306/- | 27,37,029/- | 24.12.2010 | Nov’2011 /9 months |
86/2015 | 1653 on 16th floor | No.9 | 1432 sft | 30.79 sq.yds | 45,35,109/- | 22,67,555/- | 14.11.2009 | Dec’2011 /6 months |
87/2015 | 1651 on 16th floor | No.8 | 1432 | 30.79 sqyds | 45,35,109/- | 22,67,555/- | 14.11.2009 | Dec’2011 /6 months |
88/2015 | 2452 on 24th floor | No.9 | 1412 | 24.30 sq.ys | 51,76,000/- | 25,00,000/- | 18.10.2012 | June 2014/6 months |
93/2015 | 1740 on 17th floor | No.7 | 1432 | 30.79 sq.yds | 44,62,329/- | 21,41,665/- | 30.11.2011 | Nov’2013 |
94/2015 | 1443 on 14th floor | No.7 | 1874 | 40.29 sq.yds | 50,99,809/- | 25,49,905/- | 12.10.2009 | |
101/2015 | 2657 on 26th floor | No.10 | 1673 | 28.79 sq.yds | 62,31,313/- | 30,34,716/- | 29.10.2012 | Dec’2014 / 9 months |
138/2015 | 1427 on 14th floor | No.5 | 1792 | 38.53 sq.yds | 48,30,000/- | 23,03,000/- | 02.09.2010 | Nov’2011/ 9 months |
226/2015 | 843 on 8th floor | No.7 | 1874 | 40.29 sq.ydsw | 47,47,532/- | 23,75,000/- | 09.07.2009 | June 2011/6 months |
4. The Opposite parties had not commenced construction of the flats even after the stipulated period is expired and there is no possibility of the construction of the flats as also the Opposite parties had not responded to the repeated requests of the Complainants. The Complainants had sought for return of the amount with interest, compensation and costs of the complaint, in each case, as detailed below.
Case number | Relief sought (principal) (Rs.) | Rate of interest | Interest claimed | Compensation claimed | Costs claimed |
09/2015 | 19,09,777/- | 24% p.a. | 22,92,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
10/2015 | 19,40,000/- | 24% p.a. | 9,32,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
12/2015 | 20,10,053/- | 18% p.a. | 17,20,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
16/2015 | 44,00,000/- | 24% p.a. | - | 5,00,000/- | - |
23/2015 | 35,48,880/- | 24% p.a. | - | 11,61,000/- as per Cond.No.VIII (g) and Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation | 50,000/- |
24/2015 | 24,50,000/- | 24% p.a | 19,54,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
30/2015 | 28,17,010/- | 24% p.a | 15,49,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
38/2015 | 20,00,000/- | 18% p.a. | - | 5,00,000/- | - |
68/2015 | 28,82,957/- | 15% p.a. | 28,46,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
70/2015 | 31,55,497/- | 10% p.a. | 9,91,000/- | 1,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
75/2015 | 27,37,029/- | 18% p.a. | - | 20,57,980/- interest and compensation | - |
86/2015 | 22,67,555/- | 24% p.a. | - | 30,000/- towards compensation and Rs.20,000/- per month towards monthly rental | 20,000/- |
87/2015 | 22,67,555/- | 24% p.a. | - | 30,00.000/- towards compensation and Rs.20,000/- per month towards monthly rental | 20,000/- |
88/2015 | 25,00,000/- | 24% p.a. | - | Holding charges of Rs.1,27,080 and compensaton of Rs.10,00,000/- and rental value of RS.4,23,6000/- | 50,000/- |
93/2015 | 21,41,665/- | 24% p.a. | 17,56,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
94/2015 | 25,49,905/- | 20% p.a. | 28,85,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000 |
101/2015 | 30,34,716/- | 24% p.a. | 18,21,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
138/205 | 23,03,000/- | 24% p.a. | - | 5,00,000/- | 5,000/- |
226/2015 | 23,70,000/- | 24% p.a. | 34,20,000/- | 5,00,000/- | 50,000/- |
5. The opposite parties no.1 to 3 resisted the claim on the premise that the complaint alleging deficiency of service on the part of opposite parties relating to the sale transaction entered into between the parties is not maintainable either under law and also in view of the facts of the case and hence liable to be dismissed in limine and also in view of the fact that the Complainants did not approach them before filing the complaint either for refund of money or for cancellation or with any request, hence, cannot attribute any deficiency of service, hence, does not fall under the purview of the C.P. Act.
6. The opposite parties submitted that on their application for conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural land and FTL clearance, permission was granted for conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural land on 14.04.2007 and FTL clearance was granted on 30.12.2006 and thereafter HUDA earmarked the land as agricultural zone and the opposite patties have filed application for change of use of the land as commercial use zone. The Municipal Administration and Urban Development (I) Department notified the land in survey number 384 as residential use zone. The project could not be commenced in view of proposed road under Master Plan, until realignment of the proposed road without affecting the land in survey number 384 is made. Realignment of the proposed road was approved on 03.04.2008 and the permission was accorded approving the building plan on 11.04.2008. The opposite parties have obtained NOC from the AP Fire Services Department on 15.12.2007 and permission was granted in respect of the building with height of 90.40 meters. The opposite parties obtained NOC from Airport Authority on 10.07.2009.
7. The opposite parties have submitted that HUDA accorded technical approval on 14.10.2009 for ground + 20 upper floors and release of building permission up to 29 floors is awaited. The opposite parties have taken all necessary steps to complete the project at the earliest and the project being massive and due to the reasons beyond the control of the opposite parties, the opposite parties could not complete the project within the time frame. The opposite parties informed the complainants about the delay in completion of the project due to delay in clearance from the authorities concerned. In view of arbitration clause, the complaint is not maintainable before this Commission.
8. The opposite parties submitted that the opposite parties agreed to pay Rs.3/- per sqft in terms of Clause VIII (g) of the Agreement for the delay caused in completing the project and adjust the amount towards dues payable by the complainants. Though the delay occurred for completion of the project is beyond the control of the opposite parties, the opposite parties to maintain goodwill and relationship with the customers, willing to pay the compensation at agreed rate. But the Complainants filed the present complaints with an ulterior motive to defame and to gain. The complainants are put to strict proof of the payments made by producing the relevant receipts. The complainants have to pay admittedly the balance consideration and other charges, therefore, unless the complainants pay the balance consideration, asking for delivery of flat is illegal and arbitrary.
9. The reasons for delay is project required clearance from statutory bodies which are necessary for execution of the project. The said fact was informed to the Complainant sand even mentioned in the agreement of sale under clause No.XIV and described as “force majeure”. The Complainants who paid the part of sale consideration want to take back the investment from Hyderabad due to the changed circumstances in Hyderabad market after bifurcation of the State, thereby sought for refund of the amount. As there is some delay on the part of the Ops in delivering the flat, the complainant taken advantage of the same and filed the present complaint to avoid cancellation charges. The complaint is not within the limitation as time prescribed under Section 24A of the C.P. Act, hence not maintainable. The complainants are not entitled for refund of amount and interest thereon and any compensation and costs. There is no cause of action for the present complaint. If the complainants want to take refund of the amount, the complainants shall forego 20% of the flat cost out of the amount paid towards cancellation charges as per the terms of agreement. Hence prayed for dismissal of the complaints.
10. During the course of enquiry, the Complainant got filed evidence affidavit on his behalf and also got marked the documents as exhibits A1 to A16. On behalf of the opposite parties 1 to 3, the Managing Director of the Opposite party no.1 by name Hari Challa filed his affidavit and no documents have been filed.
11. The counsel for the Complainants and the Opposite parties had advanced their arguments reiterating the contents of the complaint and the written version in addition to filing written arguments on behalf of Complainants. Heard both sides.
12. After the matters were heard and reserved orders, the opposite parties have filed reopen petition on 3.2.2017 which were allowed. Again the opposite parties filed reopen petition along with implead petition praying this commission to implead the Bank as one of the opposite party. As a matter of fact the implead petitions were already filed on 03.11.2016 which were returned by this Commission on 28.11.2016 but again the opposite parties filed the same petitions to implead the Bank. The complaints were filed as early as in the year 2015 and the opposite parties made their appearance on 17.12.2015 that too by engaging a counsel. Nothing stopped the opposite parties to implead the bank by filing the petition since their appearance. Though the implead petitions were returned on 28.11.2016 since then the opposite parties failed to resubmit them or file the fresh implead petitions. Even if we consider the petitions filed under the provisions of C.P.C., it cannot be made applicable to the proceedings before the Consumer Fora/Commission under the CP Act, to decide the issue in question. As per Order-1 Rule 10(2) of CPC r/w Sec.21 of Limitation Act the courts are empowered to implead any person or to strike out who has been wrongly impleaded at any stage to adjudicate and settle the issues involved in the suit. However, the above provision is subject to Sec.21 of the Limitation Act.
Proviso Sec.21 of Limitation Act proceeds the following manner:
21. Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant.-
(1) Where after the institution of a suit, a new plaintiff or defendant is substituted or added, the suit shall, as regards him, be deemed to have been instituted when he was so made a party:
Provided that where the Court is satisfied that the omission to include a new plaintiff or defendant was due to a mistake made in good faith it may direct that the suit as regards such plaintiff or defendant shall be deemed to have been instituted on any earlier date.
(2) Nothing in sub-section(1) shall apply to a case where a party is added or substituted owing to assignment or devolution of any interest during the pendency of a suit or where a plaintiff is made a defendant or a defendant is made a plaintiff.
Provided that where the court is satisfied that the omission to implead a new plaintiff or defendant made in good faith it may direct that the suit as regards such plaintiff or defendant shall be deemed to have been instituted on any earlier date.
The above proviso makes it clear that this Commission has to satisfy itself that the omission to implead the new plaintiff or defendant was due to mistake made in good faith. In the case on hand, nothing is indicated in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions that the said mistake took place in good faith.
13. The points for consideration are :
i) Whether the complaint is maintainable in view of arbitration clause in the agreement of sale ?
ii) Whether the complaint is not a ‘consumer dispute’?
iii) Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite parties?
iv) To what relief ?
14. POINT NO.1 : The Complainants entered into “Agreement of Sale” with the Opposite parties for purchase of flats as detailed supra, for the consideration thereof and paid the amounts shown therein, proposed to be constructed by the Opposite parties, which are not in dispute. The agreement of sale was entered into between the Complainants and the Opposite parties in respect of the above stated flats as detailed in the table supra. Thereafter, the Complainants paid the part consideration amount as per the pricing pattern of the flat issued by the opposite parties on various dates. The agreement of sale provides for reference to arbitration. The learned counsel for the opposite parties have contended that in view of the arbitration clause in the agreement, the Complainants cannot maintain the complaint before this Commission.
15. However, remedy provided under the provisions of Consumer Protection Act is an additional remedy and in the light of law laid in “National Seeds Corporation Ltd., Vs. M.Madhusudhan Reddy reported in (2012) 2 SCC 506 wherein the maintainability of the complaint before consumer forum prior to the complainants having exhausted the other remedy was considered as under:
“The remedy of arbitration is not the only remedy available to a grower. Rather, it is an optional remedy. He can either seek reference to an arbitrator or file a complaint under the Consumer Act. If the grower opts for the remedy of arbitration, then it may be possible to say that he cannot, subsequently, file complaint under the Consumer Act. However, if he chooses to file a complaint in the first instance before the competent Consumer Forum, then he cannot be denied relief by invoking Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Act. Moreover, the plain language of Section 3 of the Consumer Act makes it clear that the remedy available in that Act is in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for the time being in force.”
Thus, in view of the ratio laid in aforementioned decision, the consumer has two options, either to proceed for arbitration process or to invoke the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act. As such, it cannot be said that the complaint is not maintainable before this Commission in view of the arbitration clause in the agreement. For the above reasons, the Point No.1 is answered in favour of the Complainants and against the Opposite parties.
16. POINTS No.2 & 3 : The Opposite parties 1 to 3 entered into Development Agreement with the land owners of the land admeasuring Ac.19.26 guntas in survey numbers 384, 385 and 426/A situate at Tellapur village of Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Medak district and they agreed to deliver the residential flat to the Complainants in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed upon and consented thereto and as per specifications given therein. The Development Agreement is not merely an agreement and in fact, it is “Development Agreement-cum-Power of Attorney”.
17. In pursuance of the development agreement, the opposite parties have obtained permission for construction of the residential building on the land and admittedly there has been abnormal delay in completion of the project in so far as these complaints are concerned. The opposite parties have attributed the delay to the authorities concerned in granting permission and No Objection Certificate, bifurcation of the State etc., as to the cause for delay in completion of the project. The opposite parties would contend that the cause for delay is beyond their control which is ‘force majeure’.
18. The force majeure clause in the Agreement of sale does not include within its ambit the delay caused in granting permission, NOC etc. The Opposite parties failed to explain how they could take shelter under the cover of “force majeure”. We may state that the delay caused in obtaining permission or NOC etc., cannot be considered as ‘force majeure’. It is quite not understandable how the bifurcation of State can be attributed to be cause for delay in completion of the project. The opposite parties ought to have informed the complainants about the delay likely to be caused in obtaining the permission which they failed to. For that matter, the Opposite parties cannot receive any sale consideration from any person in respect of any flat unless they have obtained permission from HUDA or HMDA.
19. The complainants have submitted that owing to failure of the opposite parties in completing the construction of the subject flats, they opted for cancellation of the agreement of sale of flats and the opposite parties have contended that in order to maintain cordial relations with the complainants, they agreed to pay compensation in terms of the agreement which they entered into in normal course with other customers. The complainants got issued a notice to the Opposite parties through their counsel setting forth series of events of delay and negligence and false promises made by the Opposite parties seeking for refund of the amount on the premise of inaction on the part of the opposite parties.
20. The opposite parties have promised to complete construction of the flat and hand over its possession to the complainant(s) within the stipulated time therein with a grace period of six/nine months as agreed and on their failure to perform their part of contract, the opposite parties have proposed to pay rents but failed to pay the same. However, there is no communication from the side of the opposite parties in this regard and the opposite parties have not filed a piece of paper to show their readiness to pay compensation and adjust the same towards the dues payable by the complainants. Having received the part sale consideration amount, the Opposite parties kept with them without commencing the construction work of the building.
21. Not keeping-up promise to complete construction of the building and failure to deliver possession of the flat constitutes deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. The complainants have two options left for recovery of the amount, either by filing suit in court of law or by way of filing complaint before State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in view of the amount claimed falling within the pecuniary jurisdiction of this commission. The contention of the opposite parties that the complaint is not maintainable is not sustainable.
22. The Opposite parties can only receive such amount of sale consideration which would be in accordance with the payment schedule and correspond to the stage of construction of the flats. However, the Opposite parties had received the sale consideration in excess of what was to be received from the complainants particularly the construction of the building was not yet commenced. Not keeping-up the promise to complete construction of the building and failure to deliver possession of the flat as also not keeping-up promise to refund the amount as per the terms of the repayment scheduler constitutes deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite parties.
23. The complainants claimed refund of amount paid together with interest besides claim for damages. The complainants cannot be said to have acquiesced to the delay in construction of the project. Though the complainants have not disputed that the opposite parties have informed them about the cause for delay in obtaining permission and NOC etc., which does not disentitle them from claiming compensation. The complainants are entitled to interest @ 12% p.a. on the amount paid from the date of complaint till realization. For the reasons stated supra, the Points No.2 and 3 are answered in favour of the Complainants and against the Opposite parties.
24. POINT No.4 : In the above facts and circumstances, the points 1 to 4 are answered accordingly holding that the Opposite parties 1 to 3 are jointly and severally liable to refund the amount to the Complainants.
25. In the result, the are allowed holding the Opposite parties 1 to 3 jointly and severally liable to refund the amount paid by the Complainants. In case, sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above direction. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1. Time for compliance: four weeks.
CC NO.09/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.19,09,777/- ( as per Exs.A2 to A8) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.10/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.19,40,000/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.12/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.20,10,053/- (As per Exs.A2 to A8) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.16/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.31,75,000/- (As per Exs.A5) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.23/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.29,82.530/- (As per Exs.A2 to A8) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.24/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.24,50,000/- (As per Exs.A2 to A7) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.30/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.28,17,010/- (As per Exs.A2 to A6) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.38/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- (As per Exs.A2 and A3) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.63/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.28,82,957/- (As per Exs.A2 and A5) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.70/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.31,55,497/- (As per Exs.A2 and A12) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.75/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.27,37,029/- (As per Exs.A2 and A7) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.86/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.22,67,555/- (As per Exs.A1 and A2) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.87/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.22,67,555/- (As per Exs.A1 and A2) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.88/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- (As per Exs.A1 and A2) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.93/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.21,41,665/- (As per Exs.A2 to A3) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.94/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.25,49,905/- (As per Exs.A2 to A5) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.101/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.30,34,716/- (As per Exs.A1) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.138/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.22,71,200 /- (As per Exs.A1, A4, A5, A8) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
CC NO.226/2015 :
(i) The complaint is allowed directing the Opposite parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.,23,70,000 /- (As per Exs.A1 to A4) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of last payment till payment and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. Time for compliance: four weeks.
ii) In case sale deed was executed, the complainants shall re-convey the same to the developer on compliance of above directions. The registration charges and stamp duty etc., shall be borne by the developer OP No.1.
PRESIDENT MEMBER
Dated : 03.03.2017
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 09 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Michael Domnic Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Julius, Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 19.11.2009 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.05311 dated 03.02.2010 for Rs.14,24,777/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.04918 dated 23.03.2010 for Rs.50,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.05118 dated 19.06.2010 for Rs.1,20,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.04046 dated 15.10.2009 for Rs.55,000/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.04221 dated 04.11.2009 for Rs.30,000/-
Ex.A7 Copy of receipt bearing No.04245 dated 21.11.2009 for Rs.1,30,000/-
Ex.A8 Copy of receipt bearing No.04636 dated 31.01.2010 for Rs.1,00,000/-
Ex.A9 Copy of letter dated 16.01.2010 addressed by Op1 to complainant
Ex.A10 Copy of home loan sanction letter dated 03.02.2010
Ex.A11 Copy of Bank Account extract of the complainant from 03.02.2010 to 24.07.2013
Ex.A12 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made.
Ex.A13 Office copy of legal notice dated 16.12.2014 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A14 Original Postal receipt and postal returned covers
Ex.A15 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A16 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 10 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Shakeel Ahmed Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 01.12.2012 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.11179 dated 06.11.2012 for Rs.4,00,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.11205 dated 12.10.2012 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.11370 dated 26.12.2012 for Rs.18,00,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.11443 dated 15.03.2013 for Rs.2,00,000/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.11296 dated 12.11.2012 for Rs.4,90,000/-
Ex.A7 Copy of receipt bearing No.12058 dated 08.05.2013 for Rs.2,00,000/-
Ex.A8 Copy of Allotment Letter dated 06.11.2012 of Op1 to the complainant
Ex.A9 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A10 Office copy of legal notice dated 16.08.2014 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A11 Original Postal receipt and postal returned covers
Ex.A12 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A13 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 12 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Ankur Mittal Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Complainant No.1 No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 10.02.2010 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.04357 dated 22.11.2009 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.05410 dated 15.03.2010 for Rs.50,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.05105 dated 19.04.2010 for Rs.1,00,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.05852 dated 31.07.2010 for Rs.50,000/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.07312 dated 28.02.2011 for Rs.50,000/-
Ex.A7 Copy of receipt bearing No.07767 dated 11.06.2011 for Rs.50,000/-
Ex.A8 Copy of receipt bearing No.09487 dated 21.01.2012 for Rs.57,552/-
Ex.A9 Copy of home loan sanction letter dated 04.03.2010
Ex.A9 Copy of letter dated 16.01.2010 addressed by Op1 to complainant
Ex.A10 Copy of Bank Account extract of the complainant from 12.03.2010 to 05.01.2015
Ex.A11 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made.
Ex.A12 Office copy of legal notice dated 22.01.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A13 Original Postal receipt and postal returned covers
Ex.A14 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A15 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 16 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Sangeeth Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Velekatt, Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Reservation dated 12.11.2006 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of allotment confirmation sheet dated 09.12.2007
Ex.A3 Copy of loan disbursal letter dated 24.06.2008 of Axis Bank Ltd.,
Ex.A4 Copy of letter dated 21.03.2009 addressed by Op1 to complainant
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.1341 dated 12.11.2006 for Rs.1,00,000/-
Copy of receipt bearing No.1365 dated 18.11.2006 for Rs.12,00,000/-
Copy of receipt bearing No.030 dated 01.03.2007 for Rs.2,00,000/-
Copy of receipt bearing No.02403 dated 24.06.2008 for Rs.16,75,000/-
Copy of receipt dated 31.07.2008 of Axis Bank for Rs.2,40,000/-
CC NO. 23 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Amarnath Kale Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 09.03.2011 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of Construction Agreement dated 2.11.2011 between Op1 and the complainants
Ex.A3 Copy of sale deed dated 21.11.2011 executed by Op1 in favour of the complainants
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.07299 dated 05.04.2011 for Rs.8,10,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.07352 dated 02.03.2011 for Rs.50,000/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.07074 dated 05.03.2011 for Rs.2,00,000/-
Ex.A7 Copy of receipt bearing No.08725 dated 06.09.2011 for Rs.3,31,325/-
Ex.A8 Copy of receipt bearing No.08126 dated 28.04.2011 for Rs.15,91,205/-
Ex.A9 Copy of calculation sheet issued by the Op1 to the complainant
Ex.A10 Copy of receipt issued by the registration department dated 01.12.201
Ex.A11 Copy of receipt issued by SBH dated 21.11.2011 for Rs.3,16,350/-
Ex.A12 Copy of receipt issued by SBH dated 21.11.2012
Ex.A13 Copy of GPA dated 30.11.2018
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 24 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of A.Padmavathi Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 27.06.2009 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.03496 dated 19.06.2009 for Rs.1,00,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.614 dated 22.06.2009 for Rs.8,00,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.637 dated 20.08.2009 for Rs.7,50,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.640 dated 25.08.2009 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.678 dated 21.09.2009 for Rs.12,50,000/-
Ex.A7 Copy of receipt bearing No.688 dated 24.10.2009 for Rs.4,25,000/-
Ex.A8 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A9 Office copy of legal notice dated 19.01.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A10 Original Postal receipt and postal returned covers
Ex.A11 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A12 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 30 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Zaheen Mahaey Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 12.05.2012 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.754 dated 30.12.2013 for Rs.84,437/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.10301 dated 21.04.2012 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.09378 dated 08.04.2012 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.10331 dated 25.05.2012 for Rs.5,93,031/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.10718 dated 12.06.2012 for Rs.16,39,517/-
Ex.A7 Copy of Bank account extract from 01.04.2012 to 31.03.2013
Ex.A8 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A9 Office copy of legal notice dated 09.02.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A10 Original Postal receipt and and India Post tracking list
Ex.A11 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A12 Copy of Form 32
CC NO. 38 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Dinesh Jeswani Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 22.09.2010 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing No.05044 dated 21.09.2010 for Rs.8,78,944/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.06828 dated 30.10.2010 for Rs.11,21,056/-
Ex.A4 Copy of calculation sheet issued by Op1
Ex.A5 Copy of letter dated 18.01.2014 of the complainant to Op1
Ex.A6 Copy of email dated 04.04.2014
Ex.A7 Copy of email dated 9.5.2014
Ex.A8 Copy of email dated 19.05.2014
Ex.A9 Copy of email dated 12.06.2014
Ex.A10 Copy of order in CC No.16/2012 dated 18.10.2013 of this Commission
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 63 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Kuppuswamy Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Venkataraman, GPA of Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 16.08.2008 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.2506 dated 08.07.2008 for Rs.8,00,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.02450 dated 30.08.2008 for Rs.7,81,401/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.1782 dated 27.09.2007 for Rs.1,00,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.221 dated 27.10.2007 for Rs.12,01,556/-
Ex.A6 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A7 Office copy of legal notice dated 20.02.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A8 Original Postal receipt and postal returned covers
Ex.A9 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A10 Copy of Form 32
Ex.A11 GPA dated 04.03.2015
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 70 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Patlur Philip Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Rajan, Complainant No.1 No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 23.12.2011 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.11094 dated 16.10.2012 for Rs.1,50,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.11114 dated 18.09.2012 for Rs.1,50,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.10672 dated 19.07.2012 for Rs.3,00,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.10662 dated 29.06.2012 for Rs.1,00,000/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.10238 dated 17.05.2012 for Rs.1,50,000/-
Ex.A7 Copy of receipt bearing No.10152 dated 19.03.2012 for Rs.2,00,000/-
Ex.A8 Copy of receipt bearing No.10151 dated 19.03.2012 for Rs.2,00,000/-
Ex.A9 Copy of receipt bearing No.09608 dated 20.01.2012 for Rs.2,00,000/-
Ex.A10 Copy of receipt bearing No.09607 dated 20.01.2012 for Rs.1,50,000/-
Ex.A11 Copy of receipt bearing No.09477 dated 09.10.2012 for Rs.7,00,000/-
Ex.A12 Copy of receipt bearing No.09403 dated 19.12.2011 for Rs.8,44,4967/-
Ex.A13 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A14 Office copy of legal notice dated 10.02.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A15 Original Postal receipt and postal returned covers
Ex.A16 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A17 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 75 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Mayank Dinesh Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Kulshrestha , Complainant No.1 No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 23.12.2011 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.06408 dated 20.12.2010 for Rs.3,00,000/-
Copy of receipt bearing No.06292 dated 31.12.2010 for Rs.1,74,703/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.06856 dated 07.01.2011 for Rs.14,98,217/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.07254 dated 18.02.2011 for Rs.1,30,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.07230 dated 31.03.2011 for Rs.1,94,703/-
Ex.A6 Copy of receipt bearing No.07563 dated 02.05.2011 for Rs.1,89,703/-
Ex.A7 Copy of receipt bearing No.09881 dated 05.03.2012 for Rs.2,49,703/-
Ex.A8 Copy of arrangement letter for home loan dated 03.01.2011
Ex.A9 Copy of complaint dated 15.03.2014 submitted to PS R.C.Puram
Ex.A10 Copy of FIR No.78/2015 dated 21.02.2015
Ex.A11 Copy of rental agreement dated 01.11.2012
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 86 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Avinash Vijay Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP Complainant No.2 No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 14.11.2009 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.04762 dated 13.02.2010 for Rs.10,67,555/-
Ex.A3 Office copy of legal notice dated 10.02.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A4 Original Postal Acknowledgements and returned postal cover
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 87 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Jagrook Dawra Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP Complainant No.2 No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 14.11.2009 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.05351 dated 05.01.2010 for Rs.10,17,555/-
Ex.A3 Office copy of legal notice dated 19.01.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A4 Original Postal Acknowledgements and returned postal cover
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 88 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Kuldeep Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Raizada, Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 18.10.2012 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Statement of account of HDFC Bank from 01.01.2012 to 31.01.2013
Ex.A3 Statement of account of HDFC Bank from 01.02.2013 to 28.02.2013
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 93 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Kota Vamshi Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Kanth, Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 30.11.2011 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing No.07040 dated 11.11.2011 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.09155 dated 23.11.2011 for Rs.6,00,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of statement of account of Bank from 01.02.2012 to 07.04.2015
Ex.A5 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made.
Ex.A6 Office copy of legal notice dated 12.04.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A7 Original Postal Acknowledgements and returned postal cover
Ex.A8 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A9 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 94 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Chaganty Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Venkata Ramana Kumar, Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 12.10.2009 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing no.03983 dated 02.10.2009 for Rs.1,88,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of receipt bearing No.03734 dated 16.08.2009 for Rs.62,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.03939 dated 30.10.2009 for Rs.7,69,962/-
Ex.A5 Copy of receipt bearing No.04200 dated 05.01.2010 for Rs.15,29,943/-
Ex.A6 Copy of Loan Sanction Letter dated 02.12.2009
Ex.A7 Copy of account extract from 22.12.2009 to 30.03.2015
Ex.A8 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A9 Office copy of legal notice dated 30.03.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A10 Original Postal receipt and postal returned covers
Ex.A11 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A12 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 101 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Abhishek Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Kapoor, Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 29.10.2012 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Office copy of legal notice dated 03.04.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A3 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A4 Original Postal receipt and postal acknowledgements and returned cover
Ex.A5 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A6 Copy of Form 32
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 138 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Ramakrishna Rao Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of Power of Attorney dated 14.10.2010
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing No.05789 dated 20.08.2010 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of agreement of Sale dated 02.09.2010 executed by the Op1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A4 Copy of receipt bearing No.05858 dated 03.09.2010 for Rs.67,200/-
Ex.A5 Copy of account extract from 01.10.2010 to 01.04.2011
Ex.A6 Copy of email dated 04.05.2014
Ex.A7 Copy of email dated 7.05.2014
Ex.A8 Copy of email dated 15.05.2014
Ex.A9 Copy of email dated 12.01.2015
Ex.A10 Copy of email dated 02.03.2015
Ex.A11 Copy of email dated 04.03.2015
Ex.A12 Copy of email dated 25.05.2015
Ex.A13 Copy of email dated 6/7
Ex.A14 Copy of email dated 6/7
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
CC NO. 226 OF 2015
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For Complainant : For Opposite parties :
Affidavit evidence of Sumit K Tiwary, Sri Hari Challa, as RW1 (on behalf of OP
Complainant No.1).
EXHIBITS MARKED
For Complainants :
Ex.A1 Copy of agreement of sale dated 09.07.2009 executed by the Op No.1 in favour of the complainant
Ex.A2 Copy of receipt bearing No03690 dated 23.09.2009 for Rs.14,00,000/-
Ex.A3 Copy of Banker’s cheque dated 15.09.2009 for Rs.2,50,000/-
Ex.A4 Copy of Banker’s cheque dated 15.12.2009 for Rs.12,50,000/-
Ex.A5 Copy of letter of the opposite party no.1 showing the details of payment to be made
Ex.A6 Office copy of legal notice dated 30.03.2015 got issued by the complainants to the Opposite parties no.1 to 3
Ex.A7 Postal receipts and postal acknowledgements
Ex.A8 Copy of Certificate of Incorporation
Ex.A9 Copy of Form 32
PRESIDENT MEMBER
Dated: 03.03.2017
