West Bengal

South 24 Parganas

CC/209/2014

AMAL ROY, S/O. Kanai Lal Roy. - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. MR. BISWAPRIYA GIRI, Managing Director of URO AGRO India Limited. - Opp.Party(s)

Partha Sarathi Kashyapi.

17 Jun 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPLUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

SOUTH 24 – PARGANAS , JUDGES’ COURT, ALIPORE KOLKATA-700 027

 

C.C. CASE NO. ___209__ OF ___2014______

 

DATE OF FILING :_ 7.5.2014_     DATE OF PASSING JUDGEMENT:_17.6.2014_

 

Present                        :   President       :   Nanda Dulal Guin

 

                                        Member        :    Dr. Asit Baran Chakrabarti

                                                                                    AND

                                                                  Dr. (Mrs.) Shibani Chakraborty

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

COMPLAINANT                  : Amal Roy, s/o Kanai lal Roy of 4, B.N. Sarani,

P.O Nona Chandan Pukur, Barrackpore, Dist. North 24-Parganas,  Kolkata – 122.

 

-VERSUS  -

 

O.P/O.Ps                                 : 1. Mr. Biswapriya Giri, Managing Director of

URO Agro India Limited at 94, Matheswar Tala Road, P.S Tiljala, Kolkata - 46  and also at DN-13, Saltlake, Sector-V, Jamini Tower, 2nd Floor, P.S. South Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 92.

2.   Mr. Suranjan Karmakar,s/o late Balaram Karmakar , P.O & P.S Nimta, District- North 24-Parganas, Kolkata – 49.

             ________________________________________________________________________

 

                                                            J  U  D  G  E  M  E  N  T

 

 

Sri Nanda Dulal Guin, President

 

            The case of the complainant in a nut-shell is this that he purchased 2(two) debentures of different values totaling to Rs.5 lacs and the O.P-1 issued certificates. It was given to understand that over the said amount interest @2% per month would be paid. Ultimately the same was not done. Several requests did not yield any fruitful result. Hence, this case.

            The O.P-2 has appeared in this case and practically supported the case of the complainant.

            Inspite of due service of notice the O.P-1 has fought shy of entering his appearance in this case.

            The complaint is supported by affidavit and the same is treated as evidence.

            Xerox copies of certain documents have been annexed with the complaint.

                                                                        Decision with reasons

            From the unchallenged testimony the case of the complainant is proofed and we find no reason to disbelieve the same. As a result the case succeeds.

            Hence,

                                                                        Ordered

That the case being C.C.no. 209 of 2014 be and the same is decreed on consent against the O.P-2 and exparte against the O.P-1 with cost of Rs.10,000/- payable by O.P-1.

The O.P-1 is directed to refund the total invested amount of Rs.5 lacs with interest @2% per month from date of filing of this case  till this date.

All the amounts should be paid within one month from this day, failing which, the O.P-1 will have to pay penalty @ Rs.100/- per month till realization. 

Let a plain copy of judgement be supplied to the parties free of cost as per rule.

 

 

Member                                                           Member                                   President

 

Dictated and corrected by me

 

 

 

 

                        President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The judgement in separate sheet is ready and is delivered in open Forum. As it is , 

 

 

Ordered

That the case being C.C.no. 209 of 2014 be and the same is decreed on consent against the O.P-2 and exparte against the O.P-1 with cost of Rs.10,000/- payable by O.P-1.

The O.P-1 is directed to refund the total invested amount of Rs.5 lacs with interest @2% per month from date of filing of this case  till this date.

All the amounts should be paid within one month from this day, failing which, the O.P-1 will have to pay penalty @ Rs.100/- per month till realization. 

Let a plain copy of judgement be supplied to the parties free of cost as per rule.

 

 

Member                                                           Member                                   President

 

 

-

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.