AMAL ROY, S/O. Kanai Lal Roy. filed a consumer case on 17 Jun 2014 against 1. MR. BISWAPRIYA GIRI, Managing Director of URO AGRO India Limited. in the South 24 Parganas Consumer Court. The case no is CC/209/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 22 Apr 2015.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPLUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
SOUTH 24 – PARGANAS , JUDGES’ COURT, ALIPORE KOLKATA-700 027
C.C. CASE NO. ___209__ OF ___2014______
DATE OF FILING :_ 7.5.2014_ DATE OF PASSING JUDGEMENT:_17.6.2014_
Present : President : Nanda Dulal Guin
Member : Dr. Asit Baran Chakrabarti
AND
Dr. (Mrs.) Shibani Chakraborty
COMPLAINANT : Amal Roy, s/o Kanai lal Roy of 4, B.N. Sarani,
P.O Nona Chandan Pukur, Barrackpore, Dist. North 24-Parganas, Kolkata – 122.
-VERSUS -
O.P/O.Ps : 1. Mr. Biswapriya Giri, Managing Director of
URO Agro India Limited at 94, Matheswar Tala Road, P.S Tiljala, Kolkata - 46 and also at DN-13, Saltlake, Sector-V, Jamini Tower, 2nd Floor, P.S. South Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata – 92.
2. Mr. Suranjan Karmakar,s/o late Balaram Karmakar , P.O & P.S Nimta, District- North 24-Parganas, Kolkata – 49.
________________________________________________________________________
J U D G E M E N T
Sri Nanda Dulal Guin, President
The case of the complainant in a nut-shell is this that he purchased 2(two) debentures of different values totaling to Rs.5 lacs and the O.P-1 issued certificates. It was given to understand that over the said amount interest @2% per month would be paid. Ultimately the same was not done. Several requests did not yield any fruitful result. Hence, this case.
The O.P-2 has appeared in this case and practically supported the case of the complainant.
Inspite of due service of notice the O.P-1 has fought shy of entering his appearance in this case.
The complaint is supported by affidavit and the same is treated as evidence.
Xerox copies of certain documents have been annexed with the complaint.
Decision with reasons
From the unchallenged testimony the case of the complainant is proofed and we find no reason to disbelieve the same. As a result the case succeeds.
Hence,
Ordered
That the case being C.C.no. 209 of 2014 be and the same is decreed on consent against the O.P-2 and exparte against the O.P-1 with cost of Rs.10,000/- payable by O.P-1.
The O.P-1 is directed to refund the total invested amount of Rs.5 lacs with interest @2% per month from date of filing of this case till this date.
All the amounts should be paid within one month from this day, failing which, the O.P-1 will have to pay penalty @ Rs.100/- per month till realization.
Let a plain copy of judgement be supplied to the parties free of cost as per rule.
Member Member President
Dictated and corrected by me
President
The judgement in separate sheet is ready and is delivered in open Forum. As it is ,
Ordered
That the case being C.C.no. 209 of 2014 be and the same is decreed on consent against the O.P-2 and exparte against the O.P-1 with cost of Rs.10,000/- payable by O.P-1.
The O.P-1 is directed to refund the total invested amount of Rs.5 lacs with interest @2% per month from date of filing of this case till this date.
All the amounts should be paid within one month from this day, failing which, the O.P-1 will have to pay penalty @ Rs.100/- per month till realization.
Let a plain copy of judgement be supplied to the parties free of cost as per rule.
Member Member President
-
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.