Telangana

StateCommission

EA/41/2014

1. Pitta Satya Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Maytas Properties Limited, - Opp.Party(s)

Ms.Prabhakar Sripada

25 Oct 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Execution Application No. EA/41/2014
In
 
1. 1. Pitta Satya Kumar
Flat F.D, Jains Akanksha,Sreebagh Colony, Kothaguda Kondapur, Hyderabad 500 084 A.P
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1. Maytas Properties Limited,
Now known as Hill County Properties Limited, Regd. Office at Bachupally,Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad Rep. by its Managing Director
2. 2. Mr. M D Khattar, Managing Director, Maytas Properties Limited, Now Known as Hill County Properties Limited,
Regd. Office at Hill County Bachupally, Hyderabad 500 072
3. 3. Mr. Arun K. Saha Director, Maytas Properties Limited, Now Known as Hill County Properties Limited,
Regd. Office at Hill County Bachupally, Hyderabad 500 072
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 25 Oct 2016
Final Order / Judgement

 BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION

EA No. 41 of 2014

In

 CC 43 of 2010

Between:

Pitta Satya Sai Kumar

Flat # F-D, Jains Akanksha,

Sreebagh colony, Kothaguda,

Kondapur, Hyderabad- 500 084

Andhra Pradesh                                                      ..          Petitioner/complainant

 

 

And

 

  1. M/s. Maytas  Properties Ltd

(now known as  Hill County Properties   Ltd

Regd. Office  at Bachupally

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

 Hyderabad – 500 072 rep. by its Managing Director

 

  1. Mr. M. D. Khattar,
    Managing Director

Maytas Properties Limited

(Now known as Hill Country Properties Limited)

Regd. Office at Hill Country, Bachupallhy

Hyderabad – 500 072.

 

  1. Mr. Arun Kumar Saha

S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha, age about 60 years,

Director, Maytas Properties Limited

(now known as Hill Country Properties Limited )

Regd. Office at Hill Country, Bachupally,

Hyderabad – 500 072.                                 ..          Respondents/opposite parties
 

 

Counsel for the petitioner                                      :           M/s. V. Appa Rao

 

Counsel for the Respondent                                 :           M/s. K. Vishweshwara Reddy for

                                                                                                R1 to R3.

                                   

 

Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                    And

 

                                                            Sri Patil Vithal Rao, Member

 

 

                                    TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH  DAY OF OCTOBER

                                                            TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

           

                         Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )

 

                                                            *******

 

  1. This is an application   filed by the complainant U/s.27  of the Consumer Protection Act seeking to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC 43 of 2010 on the file of this Commission and punish them  as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.

 

  1.  Counsel on both sides present. Heard.

 

  1. Counsel for the first opposite party filed Memo stating that he is  depositing cheque bearing No. 184450 dated 24.10.2016 for an amount of Rs.27,87,676/-  (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Eighty Seven Thousand Six Hundred and Seventy Six ) only   towards EMI principal and EMI  Interest amount payable to complainant with unregistered Unit who availed housing loan from ICICI Bank as per the statement provided by the said bank.  Counsel on both sides informed that the petitioner has received the total amount and that they have no claim against the respondents/opposite parties and requested to dispose of the case towards full and final settlement as settled out of court..

 

  1. In view of the above facts and circumstances Memo recorded and  the E.A. is closed as settled out of court towards full and final settlement. Since EA is closed, EAOA 379 of 2014 and EAIA 469 of 2016 are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

 

 

PRESIDENT            MEMBER

            DATED : 25.10.2016.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.