BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION

EA No. 42 of 2014

In

 CC 111 of 2010

S. Chandra Sekhar

S/o S Seetharamaiah

Flat No. 108, Shree Homes Suha Apts

Hanuman Nagar, Manikonda

Hyderabad – 500 089                                              ..          Petitioner/complainant

And

1. M/s. Maytas  Properties Ltd

(now known as  Hill County Properties   Ltd

Regd. Office  at Bachupally

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

 Hyderabad – 500 072 rep. by its Managing Director

2. Mr. M. D. Khattar,
   Managing Director

Maytas Properties Limited

(Now known as Hill Country Properties Limited)

Regd. Office at Hill Country, Bachupallhy

Hyderabad – 500 072.

3. Mr. Arun Kumar Saha

S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha, age about 60 years,

Director, Maytas Properties Limited

(now known as Hill Country Properties Limited )

Regd. Office at Hill Country, Bachupally,

Hyderabad – 500 072.                                 ..          Respondents/opposite parties
 

Counsel for the petitioner                                      :           M/s. V. Appa Rao

Counsel for the Respondent                                 :           M/s. K. Vishweshwara Reddy for

                                                                                                R1 to R3.

Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

                                                                                    And

                                                            Sri Patil Vithal Rao, Member

                                    TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH  DAY OF OCTOBER

                                                            TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

                         Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )

                                                            *******

1. This is an application   filed by the complainant U/s.27  of the Consumer Protection Act seeking to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC 111 of 2010 on the file of this Commission and punish them  as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.

2.  Counsel on both sides present. Heard.

3. Counsel for the first opposite party filed Memo stating that he is  depositing cheque bearing No. 184455 dated 24.10.2016 for an amount of Rs.32,68,821/-  ( Rupees Thirty Two Lakhs Sixty Eight Thousand Eight Twenty One) only   towards EMI principal and EMI  Interest amount payable to complainant with unregistered Unit who availed housing loan from ICICI Bank as per the statement provided by the said bank.  Counsel on both sides informed that the petitioner has received total amount and  that they have no claim against the respondents/opposite parties and requested to dispose of the case towards full and final settlement as settled out of court..

4. In view of the above facts and circumstances Memo recorded and  the E.A. is closed as settled out of court towards full and final settlement. Since EA is closed, EAIA 468  of 2016 and EAIA 622 of 2016 are dismissed as infructous. No costs.

PRESIDENT            MEMBER

            DATED : 25.10.2016.