West Bengal

Birbhum

MA/49/2018

Md. Nurul Islam, S/o. Sk. Sansulla, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. Manager, State Bank of India, - Opp.Party(s)

17 May 2018

ORDER

The Complainant files a petition for extension of the interim order. The petition be treated as M.A No. 49/2018.

We find that by sending notice to the O.Ps they are directed to file show cause as to why the prayer of the Complainant regarding interim order shall not to be allowed.

But the AD regarding sending of notice to the O.Ps through registered post returned back after service but none appear on behalf of the O.Ps. The O.Ps have not come to place their case.

In this juncture we think prayer of the Complainant is to be allowed.

Hence,

            Ordered,

                        that the petition dated 17/05/2018 filed by the Complainant for extension of the interim order, passed on 23/04/2018, i.e. M.A No. 49/2018 is allowed.

Thus the MA is disposed of accordingly.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.