Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

CC/19/2012

MR. CH. NAGA REJ, S/O CH RAMESH, AGED 27 YEARS, - Complainant(s)

Versus

1. BMW INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD., REP BY ITS FINANCIAL MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. CH. Naga Tej

23 Apr 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/2012
 
1. MR. CH. NAGA REJ, S/O CH RAMESH, AGED 27 YEARS,
R/O PLOT NO. 391, PADMINI NILAYA, 1ST FLOOR, MADHAPUR, HYDERABAD.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. 1. BMW INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD., REP BY ITS FINANCIAL MANAGER
BRANCH OFFICE, 6-3-569, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD.
2. 2. BMW INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD., REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR & CEO,
PHASE-II, BUILDING NO.10, TOWER-C, 14TH FLOOR, GURGOAN.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

 

C.C.No.19 OF 2012

 

Between:

Mr.Ch.Naga Tej S/o Ch.Ramesh
aged 27 years, Plot No.391, Padmini Nilaya
1st

Madhapur, Hyderabad being Director of
M/s Sree Kaleswari Travels Pvt Ltd.

                                                                                                              

       

 

1.  BMW India Financial Services Pvt Ltd.,

Rep. by its Financial Manager, Mr.Ravi Dev

Branch Office: 6-3-569, Opp: RTA Office

Somajiguda, Hyderabad-018

2.  BMW India Financial Services Pvt Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director & CEO

Mr.Dan De Christopher having its branch

Office at DLF Cyber City, Phase-II, Building

No.10, Tower-C, 14th

               

 

Counsel for the Appellant             

Counsel for the Respondent          

 

       

QUORUM:  

                       SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

  

  

 

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

***

 

 

1.            `5,00,000/- towards pending installments, a sum of`10,00.000/- towards compensation for suffering mental agony and`50,000/- towards costs.

2.    `34,51,000/- for purchase of BMW car which was USAIndia India, the complainant paid the entire installments due and he informed the local branch of the opposite party that he would pay the installments after he returned toIndia.

3.     

4.        Delhi

5.             

6.              

7.             

8.            

9.            

i)                            Whether the complaint is maintainable in view of the initiation of arbitration proceedings and purchase of the car by a company?

ii)                          Whether the opposite parties rendered deficient service by repossessing the vehicle?

iii)                         To what relief?

 

10.              `34,50,000/- from the opposite parties and execution of agreement by      Delhi.

       

11.   

Section 2(1)(d):

‘consumer’ means any person who,—

       

        

Explanation: for the purposes of this clause, “commercial purpose” does not include use

 

Section 2(1)(o):

‘service’ means service of any description which is made available to potential users and includes the provision of facilities in connection with banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing, supply of electrical or other energy, board or lodging or both, housing construction, entertainment, amusement or the purveying a news or other information (but does not include the rendering of any service free of charge or under a contract of personal service).”

“The word ‘commercial’ according to the Oxford Dictionary means viewed as a matter of profit and loss. The word ‘purpose’ means ‘object which is in view or for which Municipal Board, Unnao

 

12.   

13.   vide,

14.   

15.      

 

“The State Consumer Forum has also no jurisdiction to grant the reliefs, it has actually granted in this case viz. quashing the bills prepared on the basis of tariff for 'continuous power' consumers and directing the Electricity Board to bill the Complainant — M/s. Anand Cane Crusher hereafter at the 'non-continuous process' consumer tariff rate. It has no authority to give such relief under Section 14 of the Consumer Protection Act.”

 

16.              Birla Technologies Ltd. Versus Neutral Glass and Allied Industries Ltd. reported in CDJ 2010 SC-1177  

“that   

 

 

17.        18.   

19.                                                               

 

                                                                                                                                              కె.ఎం.కె*

 

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

                               

For complainant                                                 

NIL                                                                                                                 

For complainant

1.  Inventory sheet dated 11.02.2012,

2.  Registration certificate,

3.  Early termination dated 10.2.2012,

4.  Passport of the complainant,

5.  Statement of account of loan A/c No.CN00012232 and

6.  Demand draft with cover letter dated 13.02.2012

 

For opposite parties

 

1.  Power of attorney dated 1.6.11.2011,

2.  Agreement dated 30.5.2011,

3.  Statement of account dated 25.7.2012,

4.  Legal notice dated 25.1.2012,

5.  Orders of Additional District Judge, New Delhi dated 6.2.2012,

6.  Notice for arbitration proceedings dated 7.3.2012,

7.  Statement of claim dated 9.3.2012,

8.  Notice for arbitration proceedings dated 30.3.2012.

 

 

 

MEMBER

 

       MEMBER

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.